Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UTM_GLOBAL_POSITION Message for collision avoidance is not send on Pixhawk4 with FW 1.9.0beta #11656

Closed
NAmmann opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@NAmmann
Copy link

NAmmann commented Mar 15, 2019

Tying to use the UTM_GLOBAL_POSITION message for collision avoidance with Pixhawk4 and PX4 FW 1.9.0beta. But the MavLink Inspector does not show the message. Not on the telemetry one nor two port.

@LorenzMeier
Copy link
Member

I checked and it is enabled on both channels. So it looks like one of the conditions to send it is not met.

@NAmmann
Copy link
Author

NAmmann commented Mar 18, 2019

What are the exact conditions to be met for activating the sending of the message?

@LorenzMeier
Copy link
Member

There are no conditions according to the code. I was wondering if your link might be saturated? What is the output of "mavlink status"?

@NAmmann
Copy link
Author

NAmmann commented Mar 18, 2019

Zur Zeit habe ich eine USB und D2X Verbindung.
mavlink status

@NAmmann
Copy link
Author

NAmmann commented Mar 18, 2019

Oh. And this is from a Pixhawk2 Cube. I wanted to check if my problem is just with the Pixhawk 4. And it turns out, that it is not.

@NAmmann
Copy link
Author

NAmmann commented Mar 18, 2019

Hier nun der Mavlink Status beim Pixhawk 4: mavlink status
Das zweite Device ist das D2X, auf welchem die UTM_GLOBAL_POSITION Nachricht relevant ist.

@eyeam3
Copy link
Contributor

eyeam3 commented Mar 25, 2019

I tested this on the bench and receive the UTM_GLOBAL_POSITION on telem1 and telem2. What version of QGC do you use when running Mavlink Inspector?

@dk7xe
Copy link
Contributor

dk7xe commented Mar 25, 2019

#11718 describes a similar issue.

@NAmmann
Copy link
Author

NAmmann commented Apr 2, 2019

Updating the QGC to a version understanding the message and setting MAV_PROTO_VER = 2 solves the problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants