Benchmarks
Below are some benchmarks comparing the RaSCSI running on different variants of Raspberry Pi's, along with the SCSI2SD version 5 and an original Apple hard drive as a comparison.
Some notes on this:
- There are multiple SCSI2SD scores. I ran the test on two different volumes on the SCSI2SD and got slightly different scores.
- I suspect that the Pi 0 got higher scores because the RaSCSI software only uses one core. This gives the Pi 0 a slight clock speed advantage
Macintosh Quadra 840av
- 68040 Processor at 40MHz
- 128MB RAM
- 1MB VRAM
- Seagate ST3600N 500MB HD w/stock Apple firmware
- MacOS 8.1
- Drive cache configured at 128KB
- Norton System Info 3.5 Part of Norton Utilities
- 1.5GHz ARM Cortex-A72 - Quad core
- 4GB RAM
- Samsung 32GB EVO Plus SD Card
- Raspberry Pi OS - 2020-05-27-raspios-buster-full-armhf
- RaSCSI - akuker version 1.5 - https://github.com/akuker/RASCSI-68kmlaver/tree/dual_connector
- 900MHz ARM Cortex 7 - Quad core
- 1GB RAM
- Samsung 32GB EVO Plus SD Card
- Raspberry Pi OS - 2020-05-27-raspios-buster-full-armhf
- RaSCSI - akuker version 1.5 - https://github.com/akuker/RASCSI-68kmlaver/tree/dual_connector
- 1GHz ARM11 - Single core
- 512MB RAM
- Samsung 32GB EVO Plus SD Card
- Raspberry Pi OS - 2020-05-27-raspios-buster-full-armhf
- RaSCSI - akuker version 1.5 - https://github.com/akuker/RASCSI-68kmlaver/tree/dual_connector
- Version v5.0a - http://inertial.biz/index.php?title=SCSI2SD
- Firmware version 4.8.04
- Samsung 32GB EVO Plus SD Card
erichelgeson ran SCSI2SD v6 on a PowerMac G3 with Norton version 5 and received a score of 247. This high score was probably influenced by a much faster computer than a Quadra 840av, which was used on the other tests. But, its also likely that the SCSI2SD v6 also has a lot better performance.