You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we publicly upload a run, we save the comment in the "additional information" field and in the "submission comment" field.
In the end, the first one is chosen to be visualised when we hover on the plot.
Isn't it weird? I would select the second comment (the one that we make at public submission). In my mind the first one was more for local visualisation. No?
Either way it has to be clear in the description. Currently, there are inconsistency in the comments (because I did not care about the first "additional information" comment).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To be honest, I think that we should remove the "additional information" altogether. I think that it is confusing. People think that they need to fill it out.
the comment that should be visible when hovering on the plot is the submission comment, not the comment that can be made in the initial "additional information" panel.
we will remove the entire "additional information" panel, and only keep one field for a comment that does not need to be kept at the public submission step.
When we publicly upload a run, we save the comment in the "additional information" field and in the "submission comment" field.
In the end, the first one is chosen to be visualised when we hover on the plot.
Isn't it weird? I would select the second comment (the one that we make at public submission). In my mind the first one was more for local visualisation. No?
Either way it has to be clear in the description. Currently, there are inconsistency in the comments (because I did not care about the first "additional information" comment).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: