Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Algorithm may hit job limit - tone down emitted message #5765

Closed
woodsp-ibm opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Algorithm may hit job limit - tone down emitted message #5765

woodsp-ibm opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
mod: algorithms Related to the Algorithms module type: enhancement It's working, but needs polishing

Comments

@woodsp-ibm
Copy link
Member

On seeing this message it confuses some users to believe that a failure has ocurred when exceuting an algorithm that requires lots of circuits to be executed when a job limit is reached. The backend limit error is detected when submitting a job so the code progresses as expected - however the message, maybe due to the fact that it is at Warning level, confuses people. Perhaps this should be dropped to Debug level so we can see its happening if we need to debug a problem, and so users would not normally see this.

https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit-terra/blob/92f73f72cde40841d9080e32e87126e0b90d4c60/qiskit/utils/run_circuits.py#L168-L169

@woodsp-ibm woodsp-ibm added type: enhancement It's working, but needs polishing mod: algorithms Related to the Algorithms module labels Feb 1, 2021
@woodsp-ibm
Copy link
Member Author

Algorithms have been refactored over to use primitives and circuit execution etc is now handled by these. As such I am closing this issue.

@woodsp-ibm woodsp-ibm closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
mod: algorithms Related to the Algorithms module type: enhancement It's working, but needs polishing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant