Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

About the result of SE-ResNet164 on cifar10 #3

Open
rederyang opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

About the result of SE-ResNet164 on cifar10 #3

rederyang opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@rederyang
Copy link

In the paper, they got 4.39 error rate on cifar10. I tried to reproduce the result but only got around 4.87 (4.73 in the best case) like your result. Did you do further experiments and what is your best result? Thanks!
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rederyang