Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RPL headers need documentation #2656

Closed
jnohlgard opened this issue Mar 20, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

RPL headers need documentation #2656

jnohlgard opened this issue Mar 20, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Area: doc Area: Documentation Area: network Area: Networking Community: good first issue This issue is good for newcomers to RIOT to be addressed / implemented Type: enhancement The issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation

Comments

@jnohlgard
Copy link
Member

some rpl headers are completely missing Doxygen comments, others have Doxygen commands, but inside normal comment blocks, so Doxygen ignores them.

sys/net/include/rpl.h should also contain a @defgroup rpl

@jnohlgard jnohlgard added Type: enhancement The issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation Area: network Area: Networking Area: doc Area: Documentation labels Mar 20, 2015
@BytesGalore BytesGalore mentioned this issue Mar 20, 2015
21 tasks
@OlegHahm OlegHahm modified the milestone: Release 2015.06 May 28, 2015
@jnohlgard
Copy link
Member Author

old stack was removed.

@miri64 miri64 added the Community: good first issue This issue is good for newcomers to RIOT to be addressed / implemented label Sep 30, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: doc Area: Documentation Area: network Area: Networking Community: good first issue This issue is good for newcomers to RIOT to be addressed / implemented Type: enhancement The issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants