[Issue]: Lack of ROCM_LIBPATCH_VERSION environment variable produces incorrect library name for libamdocl64

[AngryLoki]

Problem Description

Hi,

0ef7e3a added version name to libamdocl64.so. However this change was not documented and had no fallback for distro maintainers, who operate on releases (and don't know such things as "patch version").

When ROCM_LIBPATCH_VERSION environment variable is not specified, build produces library named libamdocl64.so. (with dot on the end - see https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/rocm-opencl-runtime/files/ for example). I guess some potential solution would be to add fallback like this:

--- a/opencl/amdocl/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/opencl/amdocl/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ set(AMDOCL_LIB_VERSION_MAJOR "2")
 set(AMDOCL_LIB_VERSION_MINOR "1")
 if(DEFINED ENV{ROCM_LIBPATCH_VERSION})
   set(AMDOCL_LIB_VERSION_PATCH "${AMDOCL_LIB_VERSION_MAJOR}.${AMDOCL_LIB_VERSION_MINOR}.$ENV{ROCM_LIBPATCH_VERSION}")
+else()
+  set(AMDOCL_LIB_VERSION_PATCH "${AMDOCL_LIB_VERSION_MAJOR}.${AMDOCL_LIB_VERSION_MINOR}")
 endif()
 
 set_target_properties(amdocl PROPERTIES

Operating System

Gentoo

CPU

GPU

ROCm Version

ROCm 6.3.0

ROCm Component

No response

Steps to Reproduce

No response

(Optional for Linux users) Output of /opt/rocm/bin/rocminfo --support

No response

Additional Information

No response

[ppanchad-amd]

Hi @AngryLoki. Internal ticket has been created to investigate your issue. Thanks!