You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't know where else to ask this, so I'll open a discussion:
Why does installation of RMG now require importing and linking RMS with Julia?
From my perspective, I want to use RMG to generate mechanisms which are agnostic as far as simulation software goes (Chemkin, Cantera, RMS).
Naively, pulling in Julia and RMS seems to add bloat to an RMG installation that I don't need and seems to be outside of most use-cases (in my anecdotal experience).
So (1) what is the reason for these dependencies and (2) can there be an option to not pull in Julia and RMS on RMG installations?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I don't know where else to ask this, so I'll open a discussion:
Why does installation of RMG now require importing and linking RMS with Julia?
From my perspective, I want to use RMG to generate mechanisms which are agnostic as far as simulation software goes (Chemkin, Cantera, RMS).
Naively, pulling in Julia and RMS seems to add bloat to an RMG installation that I don't need and seems to be outside of most use-cases (in my anecdotal experience).
So (1) what is the reason for these dependencies and (2) can there be an option to not pull in Julia and RMS on RMG installations?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions