-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update oxygen-16 cross sections #11
Comments
Hi Jost,
Thanks for work on this!
* I suggest committing the new cross sections with some appropriate name, and also re-committing copies of the existing default xs files with a name as you suggest. Maybe don’t change the defaults at the moment. (Actually probably would be good to establish some naming conventions...).
* Yes, that would be very welcome. I suggest a new directory.
* I found a note in my log (from 2010!) that xs_nue_O16_2.dat was a very old version made by Rachel Carr. I think it might be from Haxton, but would have to check.
Kate
From: Jost Migenda ***@***.***>
Date: Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM
To: SNOwGLoBES/snowglobes ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: [SNOwGLoBES/snowglobes] update oxygen-16 cross sections (#11)
SNOwGLoBES currently uses the oxygen-16 cross sections from Kolbe et al. 2002. In 2018, a more accurate calculation was published (see arXiv:1807.02367<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/arxiv.org/abs/1807.02367__;!!OToaGQ!4MiIkgGMQYX-6faa43RfJ-KU2m-xw1Qxsb1328GGGJamZNAfZWvEjXUmog3YTrVSbg$> and arXiv:1809.08398<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/arxiv.org/abs/1809.08398__;!!OToaGQ!4MiIkgGMQYX-6faa43RfJ-KU2m-xw1Qxsb1328GGGJamZNAfZWvEjXUmog2aA6zZRA$>).
I’ve already implemented these cross sections in sntools<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/JostMigenda/sntools__;!!OToaGQ!4MiIkgGMQYX-6faa43RfJ-KU2m-xw1Qxsb1328GGGJamZNAfZWvEjXUmog0qzY0Z6w$> and have written a short script to output them in the GLoBES format. Before I submit the updated files as a PR, just a few quick questions:
* Should I replace the older cross section files for those interactions? Or rename those to e.g. xs_nuebar_O16_Kolbe2002.dat?
* Should I commit the Python script to generate these files as well? I can see that there are already a few auxillary scripts in xscns/generic_xs/.
* For the nue cross section, I can see two files (xscns/xs_nue_O16.dat and xscns/xs_nue_O16_2.dat) with different values. The former appears to correspond to the Kolbe et al. 2002 paper, but I can’t find any indication what the latter is?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/SNOwGLoBES/snowglobes/issues/11__;!!OToaGQ!4MiIkgGMQYX-6faa43RfJ-KU2m-xw1Qxsb1328GGGJamZNAfZWvEjXUmog0-IOmfmw$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACAARC7HHHW2O53AYO7ANBLTP26DRANCNFSM45VFTKAQ__;!!OToaGQ!4MiIkgGMQYX-6faa43RfJ-KU2m-xw1Qxsb1328GGGJamZNAfZWvEjXUmog1cDHEKrw$>.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
SNOwGLoBES currently uses the oxygen-16 cross sections from Kolbe et al. 2002. In 2018, a more accurate calculation was published (see arXiv:1807.02367 and arXiv:1809.08398).
I’ve already implemented these cross sections in sntools and have written a short script to output them in the GLoBES format. Before I submit the updated files as a PR, just a few quick questions:
xs_nuebar_O16_Kolbe2002.dat
?xscns/generic_xs/
.xscns/xs_nue_O16.dat
andxscns/xs_nue_O16_2.dat
) with different values. The former appears to correspond to the Kolbe et al. 2002 paper, but I can’t find any indication what the latter is?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: