Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update oxygen-16 cross sections #11

Open
JostMigenda opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #12
Open

update oxygen-16 cross sections #11

JostMigenda opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #12

Comments

@JostMigenda
Copy link
Contributor

SNOwGLoBES currently uses the oxygen-16 cross sections from Kolbe et al. 2002. In 2018, a more accurate calculation was published (see arXiv:1807.02367 and arXiv:1809.08398).

I’ve already implemented these cross sections in sntools and have written a short script to output them in the GLoBES format. Before I submit the updated files as a PR, just a few quick questions:

  • Should I replace the older cross section files for those interactions? Or rename those to e.g. xs_nuebar_O16_Kolbe2002.dat?
  • Should I commit the Python script to generate these files as well? I can see that there are already a few auxillary scripts in xscns/generic_xs/.
  • For the nue cross section, I can see two files (xscns/xs_nue_O16.dat and xscns/xs_nue_O16_2.dat) with different values. The former appears to correspond to the Kolbe et al. 2002 paper, but I can’t find any indication what the latter is?
@schol
Copy link
Contributor

schol commented May 28, 2021 via email

@JostMigenda JostMigenda linked a pull request May 28, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants