Collection usage and manipulation with HTTP REST APIs specifically require its own set of standardization that provide helpful considerations and must use styles for consistency.
- All collection-based API responses SHOULD offer paging capability for consistency and evolution, regardless of the collection size or the static nature of the data. Even if the resource is returning a collection of static "types" representing 2 items, pagination should be supported in its simplest form.
// CORRECT
{
"results": [ // "results" term is a standardized part of the schema for all collection responses
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...} // schema of the your domain object can be anything you want
]
}
// INCORRECT
[
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...} // this format prevents future changes to the contract without forcing a breaking change
]
- All collection-based endpoint responses SHOULD NOT include their full domain object with all properties and attributes, but rather it should be a summary of the fields that 80% of the consumers are likely interested in (Pareto Principle). If your result domain object is small enough to be negligible then this principle does not apply.
- All collection-based endpoints
GET
request parameters SHOULD be specified as query parameters with the outlined schema below.
// CORRECT
GET https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/books
?limit=int // amount of items requested in the results of a single request
// -> Not Required, Defaults to API Defined Limit (there must be a max limit value, min limit value is 1).
&offset=int // amount of items to skip before including the number of limit results in the request
// -> Not Required, Defaults to 0, Used only for Offset-based (min offset value is 0).
&cursor=string // base64 opaque string indicating the metadata and state used to determine the set of results to return
// -> Not Required, Defaults to Empty / First Row, Used only for Cursor-based
- All collection-based endpoints SHOULD use
GET
requests for pagination and notPOST
requests unless it is necessary for the action. - All collection-based endpoints
POST
request parameters MUST be specified as parameters in the body of the request within thepaging
element and the outlined schema below.
// CORRECT
POST https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/books
// REQUEST
{
...
"paging": {
"limit": int,
"offset": int,
"cursor": string
}
}
- Pagination request parameters
MUST
never exist as both query parameters and request body parameters.
// INCORRECT
POST https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/books
?limit=int
&offset=int
&cursor=string
// REQUEST
{
"paging": {
"limit": int,
"offset": int,
"cursor": string
}
}
- All collection-based endpoint responses MUST include the root element
paging
wheneverresults
are used, with the outlined schema from offset-based or cursor-based pagination.
// RESPONSE
HTTP/1.1 200
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
... DEFINED AS PART OF OFFSET-BASED OR CURSOR-BASED PAGINATION
}
}
- If using pagination response parameters for "next" and "previous", then they MUST be set to
NULL
to indicate there is no next or previous page.
// generally speaking the first request for the first page of results will have a null previous page
GET https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/example?limit=25&offset=0
// RESPONSE
HTTP/1.1 200
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
...
"next": {
"url": "https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/example?limit=25&offset=25"
},
"previous": null
}
}
- Invalid requests due to pagination validation MUST return a
400 Bad Request
status code following the standard error schema.
// CORRECT
GET https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/books
?limit=-2 // limit cannot be a negative value
// RESPONSE
HTTP/1.1 400
Content-Type: application/problem+json
{
"title": "Invalid Data",
"status": 400,
"detail": "Missing content or invalid input provided.",
"instance": "/v1/books",
"requestId": "b6d9a290-9f20-465b-bcd3-4a5166eeb3d7",
"context": [
{
"code": "INPUT_MIN_VALUE",
"message": "Attribute 'limit' must be greater than or equal to 1.",
"field": "limit",
"source": "query",
"value": "-2"
}
]
}
Offset-based pagination is the simplest form of paging through API results and offers advantages:
- Creating a UI driven with a page selection option and the ability to skip to any page.
- See progress based on which page you're on.
- Assumes you also are ordering your results based on order queries as well.
Reference the advantages of cursor-based pagination for some reasons why you may not use offsets.
- All collection-based endpoints REQUIRE cursor-based pagination. Offset-based pagination does not scale as you get further down the index calculating the offset on large sets of data.
- APIs may offer offset-based pagination in addition to cursor-based pagination if it is required, however cursor-based pagination reduces pagination API contract changes as the API matures.
- Offset-based collection endpoint responses MUST include the root element
paging
wheneverresults
are used.
// RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
"totalCount": int, // the total count of all unique available records (results) across all paginated queries of the endpoint
// -> Not Required
"limit": int, // amount of items requested in the results of a single request, updated for the response to the max limit or the default as necessary
// -> Required, Defaults to API defined default / max or if within range the user provided limit request parameter
"offset": int, //amount of items to skip before including the number of limit results in the request
// -> Required
}
}
- Offset-based collection endpoints may OPTIONALLY make use of
next
andprevious
specifications for URLs.
// RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
"totalCount": int,
"limit": int,
"offset": int,
"next": {
"url": "string" // represents the complete URL to navigate to the next result set of data given the state of your current request (including offset, limit, cursor where appropriate)
// -> Required
// -> Example: https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/books?limit=50
},
"previous": { // optional for offset-based pagination. set to null to indicate no previous page.
"url": string // represents the complete URL to navigate to the previous result set of data given the state of your current request (including offset, limit, cursor where appropriate).
// -> Required
}
}
}
Complete URLs can be difficult to intercept behind a number of proxies/gateways for specification on URL fields, such as `next`/`previous` elements. Ensure your consuming the correct headers for construction. Also, consider the dynamic nature of the URL from different entry points across the same environments or different environments. Difficulties may also exist in dynamic documentation generation. Possible headers behind internal proxies or platforms include: `X-Forwarded-Host`, `X-Forwarded-Port`, `X-Forwarded-Proto`. Your application would still need to determine the subpath based on the request context of the application (i.e. after the host).
// SCENARIO 1: Get the first page of results (leave offset as null to default to 0)
GET https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/example?limit=25&offset=0
RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
"totalCount": 100,
"limit": 25,
"offset": 0
}
}
// SCENARIO 2: Get the second page of results
GET https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/example?limit=25&offset=25
RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
"totalCount": 100,
"limit": 25,
"offset": 25
}
}
// SCENARIO 3: Get the last page of results (skip a page)
// determine based on (totalCount - limit)
GET https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/example?limit=25&offset=75
RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
"totalCount": 100,
"limit": 25,
"offset": 75
}
}
Cursor-based Pagination works extremely well when:
- All collection-based endpoints MUST support cursor-based pagination. Offset-based pagination may be supported additionally if technology, requirements, and/or performance makes offset-based pagination more advantageous.
- Offset-based pagination does not scale as you get further down the index calculating the offset on large sets of data.
- A highly transactional database or lots of activity can make it difficult to use offsets effectively through a dataset. The paging window is subtly stabilized using a cursor or known established
next
page.
The performance advantages may be a larger requirement than the capabilities you lose:
- Ability to jump to a particular page.
- Impacted understanding of how many pages there could be.
- Cursor-based collection endpoint responses MUST include the root element
paging
wheneverresults
are used.
RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
"limit": int, // amount of items requested in the results of a single request, updated for the response to the max limit or the default as necessary
// -> Required, Defaults to API defined default / max or if within range the user provided limit request parameter
"next": { // required, set to "null" to indicate last page.
"cursor": "string", // base64 opaque string indicating the metadata and state used to determine the set of results to return to retrieve the next page.
// -> Required if next is present
"url": "string" // represents the complete URL to navigate to the next result set of data given the state of your current request (including offset, limit, cursor where appropriate)
// -> Required if next is present
// -> Example: https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/books?limit=2&cursor=dXNlcklkOjM=
},
"previous": { // required, set to "null" to indicate no previous page.
"cursor": "string", // base64 opaque string indicating the metadata and state used to determine the set of results to return to retrieve the previous page.
// -> Required if previous is present
"url": string // represents the complete URL to navigate to the previous result set of data given the state of your current request (including offset, limit, cursor where appropriate).
// -> Required if previous is present
}
}
}
- When using pagination cursors, the cursor MUST be
Base64
encoded to be opaque.
// CORRECT
RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
"limit": int,
"next": {
"cursor": "dXNlcklkOjM=",
"url": "https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/books?limit=2&cursor=dXNlcklkOjM="
},
"previous": null
}
}
// INCORRECT
RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{... DOMAIN OBJECT ...}
],
"paging": {
"limit": int,
"next": {
"cursor": "userId:3", // a cursor MUST be base64 encoded to prevent manual manipulation
"url": "https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/books?limit=2&cursor=userId:3" // the associated URL must have the matching cursor that is opaque specified
} // also missing the "previous" object which is set to "null" to indicate no previous page (not ignored).
}
}
**Consideration**: The cursor tokens used are always `Base64` strings to ensure they are opaque (meaning they appear dangerous to change to the consumer). In actuality, they store an encoded state about the cursor in it, or a cursor from a point of integration in a database or S3 for example. The cursor contract inside the Base64 string is entirely specific to the API in question. Often it can indicate the parameter being ordered alongside the next cursor ID to return results from.
Additional concepts: [Evolving API Pagination at Slack](https://slack.engineering/evolving-api-pagination-at-slack/).
- A cursor value MUST be created by the API, and never requested for the consumer to create their own cursor or apply
Base64
encoding themselves.
UserId | Username | |
---|---|---|
1 | john | email1@spscommerce.com |
2 | allyn | email2@spscommerce.com |
3 | travis | email3@spscommerce.com |
4 | aaron | email4@spscommerce.com |
5 | jay | email5@spscommerce.com |
// Scenario 1: Initial Request (no cursor)
GET https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/users?limit=2
RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{ "userId": 1, "username": "john", "email": "email1@spscommerce.com" },
{ "userId": 2, "username": "allyn", "email": "email2@spscommerce.com" }
],
"paging": {
"limit": 2,
"next": {
"cursor": "bmV4dF91c2VySWQ6Mw==", # base64.encode("next_userId:3")
# The format can be anything you like for your API, such as "next_userId_3", or even "3" if the API returns just next pages of users.
# Cursor can indicate multiple columns and asc/desc if desirable: base64.encode("Username:desc__Userid:asc__UserId:12").
# Take a note, that a cursor usually contains additional information to help API understand direction and order.
"url": "https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/example?limit=2&cursor=bmV4dF91c2VySWQ6Mw=="
},
"previous": null
}
}
// Scenario 2: Subsequent Request with a provided cursor
GET https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/users?limit=2&cursor=bmV4dF91c2VySWQ6Mw=="
RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{ "userId": 3, "username": "travis", "email": "email3@spscommerce.com" },
{ "userId": 4, "username": "aaron", "email": "email4@spscommerce.com" }
],
"paging": {
"limit": 2,
"next": {
"cursor": "bmV4dF91c2VySWQ6NQ==", # base64.encode("next_userId:5"), if the limit is adjusted manually in the subsequent request, that will obviously impact the before/after
"url": "https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/example?limit=2&cursor=bmV4dF91c2VySWQ6NQ=="
},
"previous": {
"cursor": "cHJldl91c2VySWQ6Mw==", # base64.encode("prev_userId:3"), if the limit is adjusted manually in the subsequent request, that will obviously impact the before/after
"url": "https://api.spscommerce.com/v1/example?limit=2&cursor=cHJldl91c2VySWQ6Mw=="
}
}
}
To limit or narrow down the results of a collection endpoint you may provide filtering capabilities, where a filter is part of the query parameters.
-
Filtering is not a requirement on all collection-based endpoints.
-
Filtering query parameters MUST always be optionally applied as indicated by URL Structures that all query parameters are always optional.
-
The resource identifier in a collection SHOULD NOT be used to filter collection results, resource identifier should be in the URI.
-
Filtering SHOULD only occur on endpoints that are collections using the schema described above.
-
Filtering attribute names may represent nested objects and MUST use a period to represent each segment of the object path:
grandparent.parent.child
.- Limit filter references to three levels of object hierarchy in accordance with
GET-based
HTTP Methods (Request Response).
- Limit filter references to three levels of object hierarchy in accordance with
-
Filtering MUST only be implemented on
GET-based
HTTP Methods via query parameters. -
Filtering using
GET-based
requests with query parameters SHOULD be avoided if expected use cases or allowed usage resolves URL lengths beyond a reasonable size for the developer experience or approaching limits defined in URL Structure.-
Overly verbose filtering that contains dozens or hundreds of parameters SHOULD consider if their API design is appropriate.
-
Overly verbose filtering that contains an undesirable number of parameters that cannot be redesigned SHOULD consider using a non-REST style
POST
endpoint as described under Actions in URL Structure.POST
requests for non-REST style filtering SHOULD specify parameters at the root of the request body with the same names that would be used for query parameters normally.POST
requests for non-REST style filtering SHOULD specify parameters with multiple values using JSON array format, rather than using the same property name twice.POST
requests for non-REST style filtering SHOULD result in the same response payload expectations and schema for collections as normally expected (including pagination).
// REQUEST // example GET request translated to POST search endpoint below GET /articles?title=My%20Book&title=Their%20Book&author.firstName=John&limit=25 POST /articles/search User-Agent: api-standards-v1 Content-Type: application/json { "author.firstName": "John", "title": [ "My Book", "Their Book" ], "limit": 25 } // RESPONSE HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/json { "results": [ ... results content ... ], "paging": { ... standard pagination schema ... } }
-
-
Filtering query parameters MUST be included as part of the pagination next/previous URLs, similar to how
limit
is included as an additional limiting query parameter. -
Filtering MUST be limited to equality checks of JSON attributes represented in the response payload.
- Attributes not represented in the response payload SHOULD NOT be available for filtering.
- Attribute names MUST follow standard naming and serialization patterns as defined elsewhere for their keys (see Serialization).
-
Filtering capability and support MUST be documented within your API spec to clearly indicate how a consumer can filter your resource. Given that filtering support can drastically vary from endpoint to endpoint, incredible detail and clarity must be provided within the documentation of your API spec.
Take into consideration the performance of your filtering capability. It may be undesirable to support certain filtering capabilities if it has a substantial impact on your API performance.
Collection endpoint filtering defines the convention explicitly for collection endpoints to filter results using entity fields from a response. It isn't applied to generic `/search` endpoints that require `POST` requests with a domain-specific language in the body.
Many collection endpoints require very simple filtering capability. It is desirable to keep the filtering contract simple when possible for both developer experience and performance benefits.
- Simple filtering MUST be used as the default filtering method unless you require some of the advanced features described under "Advanced" filtering.
- Simple filtering with multiple query parameters with different attribute keys MUST result in a match for all conditions using the logical "AND" operator (and not in an "OR").
- Simple filtering MAY support specifying the same attribute as a parameter multiple times desiring to support a logical "OR" operation between values belonging to the same attribute (see Query Parameters in URL Structure).
- Simple filtering MAY support wildcard filtering using an asterisk (
*
), but MUST only be supported onstring
object types.- Wildcard filter character SHOULD only appear once in a string value.
- Wildcard filters SHOULD only be applied as a prefix or suffix to a string value, and not in the middle of other characters in the string.
- Simple filtering with provided values MUST be case-sensitive.
- Simple filtering with an attribute with no value MUST be interpreted as
NULL
(nil) or an empty string. The filter should filter down to entities that either are empty strings or NULL values.- Simple filtering with an attribute with no value that is a non-nullable Boolean SHOULD result in no filtering on the attribute (returning entities matching both true/false).
- Simple filtering with values provided for a response payload that is a primitive array MUST filter the resource entities that contain the filtered value (i.e. it MUST NOT filter the child array specified in the attribute filter).
// CORRECT
GET /articles?title=My%20Book // matching the exact title prefix of "My Book" only.
GET /articles?title=My%20Book* // starting with the title prefix "My Book" matching "My Book Best", etc.
GET /articles?author.firstName=john // with first name as "john".
GET /articles?author.firstName=John&title=My%20Book // with an author first name as "John" AND title of "My Book"
GET /articles?author.age=50 // with authors age of exactly 50
GET /articles?title=My%20Book&title=Their%20Book // with a title of "My Book" OR "Their Book"
GET /articles?title= // with NULL or empty article title (this is a string attribute, not a boolean)
GET /articles?active= // with NULL for active, this will ensure that articles that are active or not active are not filtered out. This may be necessary in scenario where active=true is the default.
GET /articles?limit=25&offset=25&title=Book // combines filters with paging: showing 25 results at a time, starting with the 25th result for all article titles "Book"
GET /articles?categories=Fiction // that exist in at least the "Fiction" category.
GET /articles?categories=Fiction&categories=Drama // that exist in the category "Fiction" OR the category "Drama".
GET /articles?reviews.createdBy=jdoe // with "reviews" being a list of complex objects, that has a "createdBy" name field, this filters the articles that have reviews with createdBy equal to the value.
// INCORRECT
GET /articles?isbn_Number=My%20Book // invalid casing
GET /articles?author.name.designation.type="MR" // object selection pattern is too deep
GET /articles?author.age=5* // cannot wildcard an integer field type
GET /articles?titles=My%20Book,Their%20Book // cannot use a CSV for filtering multiple attributes.
DELETE /articles?title=My%20Book // filtering parameters SHOULD NOT be used for any method other than GET, especially not for bulk delete operations.
The implementation of even simple filtering within your API can lead to drastic performance degradation if not considered carefully on the impact.
For filtering use cases beyond the functionality provided in "Simple" filtering, a dedicated filter query parameter with custom FIQL/RSQL expressions is used.
[FIQL](https://github.com/jirutka/rsql-parser) - The Feed Item Query Language (FIQL, pronounced “fickle”) is a simple but flexible, URI-friendly syntax for expressing filters across the entries in a syndicated feed.
[RSQL](https://developer.here.com/documentation/data-client-library/dev_guide/client/rsql.html) - RSQL is a query language for RESTful APIs. It is based on FIQL, using a URI-friendly syntax, there are no unsafe characters, so URL encoding is not required.
RSQL is based on FIQL and is considered a superset of it, making it and FIQL usable in any RSQL compatible library. For clarity, it is expressed here as FIQL/RSQL. If your platform doesn't provide any library then it is possible to generate a parser using ABNF from the draft [documentation page](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-atompub-fiql-00) or from the [RSQL GitHub page](https://github.com/jirutka/rsql-parser). Take note, that FIQL/RSQL is easily extendable with custom functions required by an API and can be used with XML/JSON responses despite the fact that initially it was designed as a feed query language.
- Advanced filtering MUST specify the entirety of the expression as a value of the single dedicated
filter
query parameter unless using advanced filtering for a particular subset of your payload response.filter
MUST only be specified once in the URL.filter
MUST only contain the FIQL/RSQL syntax specified in these standards.
- Each query parameter value or any field value inside FIQL/RSQL expression MUST be URL encoded. FIQL/RSQL expression itself generally does not require encoding as there are no unsafe characters.
- FIQL/RSQL expressions MUST use logical AND operators as
;
(semicolon) and OR operators as,
(comma), regardless of newer RSQL language alternatives for the same operators, to preserve consistency between APIs. - Advanced filtering MAY be applied to particular query parameters to filter based on a subset of attributes in the format
attributeFilter
(where keywordattribute
is your attribute name), commonly referred to as hybrid filtering (hybrid between simple and advanced).- Using "simple" or "advanced" filtering without the hybrid approach SHOULD be the preferred choice. Hybrid filtering is not desirable but may be necessary based on the constraints of your implementation and requirements (including performance).
- Hybrid filtering is intended to support scenarios where API producers are unable to provide advanced filtering capability on all aspects of the payload response attributes and want to provide scope clarity in the attribute filter name.
- Hybrid filtering attribute values MUST be valid advanced filtering expressions (FIQL/RSQL).
- Hybrid filtering MAY be offered on multiple attributes, but MUST never exist if a root "filter" query parameter is available.
- Hybrid filtering with multiple attribute filters MUST logically "AND" the results of both filters together (unless the attribute name is repeated, in which case repeated attributes names are "OR" for the results as described in simple filtering).
- Hybrid filtering MAY be combined with additional simple filtering query parameters, provided they do not have a suffix of
Filter
.
- Using "simple" or "advanced" filtering without the hybrid approach SHOULD be the preferred choice. Hybrid filtering is not desirable but may be necessary based on the constraints of your implementation and requirements (including performance).
// EXAMPLE OBJECT
GET /articles
RESPONSE
{
"results": [
{
"title": "Title",
"reviewRating": 5,
"categories: ["Fiction", "Drama"]
"author": {
"firstName": "John",
"lastName": "Doe",
"age": 50
},
}
],
"paging": {
"totalCount": 1,
"limit": 25,
"offset": 0
}
}
// CORRECT
GET /articles?filter=reviewRating=gt=4 // articles with a review rating greater than 4
GET /articles?filter=title==Title;author.lastName==Doe // articles with the title "title" and author last name "Doe"
GET /articles?filter=author.age=gt=42;author.firstName==John // articles with an author of age greater than 42 AND first name "John"
GET /articles?filter=author.age=gt=42,author.firstName==John // articles with an author of age greater than 42 OR first name "John"
GET /articles?authorFilter=lastName==Doe&title=Title // hybrid filter that offers advanced filtering syntax ONLY for author object, and simple filtering otherwise.
// ADVANCED CORRECT EXAMPLE
GET /articles?filter=(categories=in=(Fiction,Drama),title==Butterflies*),(categories=out=(NonFiction),author.age=gt=12)
// articles with title starting with "Butterflies" in the Fiction OR Drama category
// OR
// articles with an author who's age is greater than 12 not in the NonFiction category.
// INCORRECT
GET /articles?filters=reviewRating=gt=4 // "filter" query parameter must not be pluralized
GET /articles?filter=reviewRating=gt=4&filter=title==test // cannot use more than one "filter" query parameter
GET /articles?filter=author.name.designation.type=="MR" // object selection pattern is too deep
DELETE /articles?title=My%20Book // filtering parameters SHOULD NOT be used for any method other than GET, especially not for bulk delete operations.
Getting Started: REST Query Language with RSQL
- Java: rsql-parser (with DataSource Connectors)
- Python: FIQL Parser (Note: Requires URL encoded string in parser input)
- Go: go-rsql
- Node.js & JavaScript: rsql
- .NET: rsql4net
- Example Lines of Code for a Custom Parser for Java Persistence API (JPA)
It is not mandatory to support all operators listed in the table below as this document is about syntax and convention. Any API may support just a subset of given operators or provide additional operators if needed.
Filter | Operator | Standard | Example | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Equals | == |
FIQL | someKey==value someKey==value someKey==value someKey==value someKey==vaue* someKey=="Should be quoted if a value contains whitespaces or any reserved characters" |
Allowed to use wildcard symbol '*' at the beginning, at the end, in the middle, or in multiple places of a string to represent 'ends with', 'starts with', 'contains', or 'like' functions. An endpoint should provide documentation about wildcard usage and the default case. |
Not Equals | != |
FIQL | someKey!=value someKey!=value someKey!=value someKey!=value someKey!=vaue* |
Allowed to use wildcard symbol '*' at the beginning, at the end, in the middle, or in multiple places of a string to represent 'not ends with', 'not starts with', 'not contains', 'not like' functions. An endpoint should provide documentation about wildcard usage and the default case. |
Less Than | =lt= |
FIQL | someKey=lt=42 | < |
Less Than or Equals | =le= |
FIQL | someKey=le=42 | <= |
Greater Than | =gt= |
FIQL | someKey=gt=42 | > |
Greater Than or Equals | =ge= |
FIQL | someKey=ge=42 | >= |
In | =in= |
RSQL | someKey=in=(1,2,3) | Can be added as a custom function to any FIQL library if you can't find any RSQL compatible library for your platform |
Not In | =out= |
RSQL | someKey=out=(1,2,3) | Can be added as a custom function to any FIQL library if you can't find any RSQL compatible library for your platform |
Is NULL | =isnull= |
Custom | someKey=isnull=true | If API requires NULL check then this operator should be used. |
String Operators | =contains= =containsic= =startswith= =startswithic= =endswith= =endswithic= =like= =notlike= =likeic= =notlikeic= |
Custom | someKey=contains=VALUE case sensitive check as the given function doesn't have 'ic' suffix, where 'ic' means "ignoring case" |
If API requires special handling for strings it is allowed to provide a custom operator with or without the 'ic' suffix to support advanced string filtering. It is the responsibility of the implementor to maintain consistency between wildcards used with 'Equals' and 'Not Equals' operators and custom functions. |
The dynamic nature of filters means that all fields cannot be listed in Open API specifications because there could be dozens for a single endpoint depending on the level of nesting in the response. Instead, Open API specification may contain generic information about the supported filtering approach, the list of allowed operators, examples, and other information that may be helpful for a user.
Sorting on collection endpoints should be done by specifying the attributes that should be sorted or ordered by using an ordering query parameter.
- Sorting is not a requirement on all collection-based endpoints.
- Sorting query parameters MUST always be optionally applied as indicated by URL Structures that all query parameters are always optional.
- Default sort order SHOULD be considered as
undefined
and non-deterministic from the API consumer's perspective when no sorting query parameters are provided.- A default sort order MUST be applied internally for implementation purposes to provide consistently paged responses.
- A default sort order modification is not considered an API breaking change unless the behavior is documented as such.
- Sorting SHOULD only occur on endpoints that are collections using the schema described above.
- Sorting MUST only be implemented on
GET-based
HTTP Methods via query parameters. - Sorting query parameters MUST be included as part of the pagination next/previous URLs, similar to how
limit
is included as an additional query parameter. - If an explicit sort order is desired, the query parameter
ordering
MUST be used to specify attribute names. - Specifying an attribute name in the ordering parameter MUST sort by that attribute ascending (ASC). Specifying a
-
sign in front modifies to descending (DESC) on the same attribute. - Attributes specified for sorting MUST match attributes returned in the response payload.
- Multiple attributes MUST be sorted on in a given request if provided by multiple
ordering
attributes, prioritized based on the order they are specified. - Sorting attribute names may represent nested objects and MUST use a period to represent each segment of the object path:
grandparent.parent.child
.
// CORRECT
GET /articles?ordering=title // order articles by title ASC
GET /articles?ordering=-title // order articles by title DESC
GET /articles?ordering=title&ordering=-reviewRating // order articles first by title ASC, then by reviewRating DESC
GET /articles?limit=25&offset=25&title=Book&ordering=title // get 25 articles per page, starting at article 25, order the articles by title ASC
GET /articles?ordering=author.firstName // order articles by authors first name ASC
// INCORRECT
GET /articles?ordering=title,-reviewRating // ordering multiple attributes is not applied via CSV
GET /articles?orderings=title&orderings=-reviewRating // never use pluralized "orderings"
DELETE /articles?ordering=title // ordering only applies to GET methods.
ETags in consideration with resource collections post some additional considerations on what the ETag
should represent and in what granularity. For more general details about using ETags
in request and response headers for optimistic concurrency, see the Request Response section. When working with ETags in collections, the following considerations should be taken into account:
ETags
used in a response header MUST represent the entire of the response body, which is the entire collection rather than an individual resource. This is typically less useful in many situations. Working with paged collection results means the response headerETag
is page-sensitive.ETags
on a collection resource MAY exist both for the entire response body as a response header, and as an individualETag
property on each resource item in the response body if needed.ETags
are best represented as metadata in headers, agnostic, or separated from the resource model representation. However, some requests to resource collections may benefit from including anETag
with each resource individual resource represented in the collection. Adding anETag
to the body of a collection response can help reduce the number of API calls by allowing clients to track changes to individual resources without needing to fetch each resource one by one to make use of request headers likeIf-Match
. If using granular collectionETags
in the response body, then:ETags
SHOULD be added to the object model for the response body as a read-only field as a sibling to theid
of each result item.ETag
response header MUST be present when retrieving an individual resource.ETag
property in the response body MUST also be present for retrieving an individual resource.ETag
workflow headers, such asIf-Match
, MUST be available when interacting with individual resources, such asPUT
,PATCH
orDELETE
requests.
// REQUEST
GET /resources
// RESPONSE
200 OK
Content-Type: application/json
{
"results": [
{
"id": "123",
"name": "Sample Object",
"etag": "33a64df551425fcc55e4d42a148795d9f25f89d4"
},
{
"id": "456",
"name": "Another Object",
"etag": "67b64df551425fcc55e4d42a148795d9f2567fg3"
}
]
...
}
// REQUEST
GET /resources/123
// RESPONSE
200 OK
Content-Type: application/json
ETag: "33a64df551425fcc55e4d42a148795d9f25f89d4"
{
"id": "123",
"name": "Sample Object",
"etag": "33a64df551425fcc55e4d42a148795d9f25f89d4"
}
Processing of ETag
and associated validation headers should be consistent with the Request Response section, returning appropriate status codes as needed.