Code contributions to OpenImageIO are always welcome, and nearly 150 people have done so over the years. Please review this document to get a briefing on our process.
There are two mail lists associated with OpenImageIO development:
-
oiio-dev For developers of the OpenImageIO code itself, or users who are really interested in the OIIO internals. This is where we mostly discuss the code (including bug reports), but are also happy to answer user questions about use or working of OIIO.
-
oiio-announce For announcements about major OIIO releases or other important news.
You can sign up for these mail lists on your own using the links above.
If you have trouble installing, building, or using OpenImageIO, but there's not yet reason to suspect you've encountered a genuine bug, start by posting a question to the oiio-dev mailing list. This is the place for question such has "How do I...".
We use GitHub's issue tracking system for bugs and enhancements: https://github.com/OpenImageIO/oiio/issues
If you are submitting a bug report, please be sure to note which version of OIIO you are using, on what platform (OS/version, which compiler you used, and any special build flags or other unusual environmental issues). Please give a specific an account of
- what you tried
- what happened
- what you expected to happen instead
with enough detail that others can reproduce the problem. Please quote the exact error message you received. If you are having trouble building, please post the full cmake output of a fresh VERBOSE=1 build.
Suspected security vulnerabilities should be reported by the same process.
If confidentiality precludes a public question or issue for any reason, you may contact us privately at security@openimageio.org.
To protect the project -- and the contributors! -- we do require a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) for anybody submitting substantial changes. Trivial changes (such as an alteration to the Makefiles, a one-line bug fix, etc.) may be accepted without a CLA, at the sole discretion of the project leader, but anything complex needs a CLA. This is for your own safety.
-
If you are an individual writing the code on your own time and you're SURE you are the sole owner of any intellectual property you contribute, use the Individual CLA.
-
If you are writing the code as part of your job, or if there is any possibility that your employers might think they own any intellectual property you create, then you should use the Corporate CLA.
Download the appropriate CLA from the links above (or find them in the src/doc directory of the software distribution), print, sign, and rescan it (or just add a digital signature directly), and email it back to us (info@openimageio.org).
Our CLA's are identical to those used by Apache and many other open source projects.
The best way to submit changes is via GitHub Pull Request. GitHub has a Pull Request Howto.
All code must be formally reviewed before being merged into the official repository. The protocol is like this:
-
Get a GitHub account, fork OpenImageIO/oiio to create your own repository on GitHub, and then clone it to get a repository on your local machine.
-
Edit, compile, and test your changes. Run clang-format (see the instructions on coding style below).
-
Push your changes to your fork (each unrelated pull request to a separate "topic branch", please).
-
Make a "pull request" on GitHub for your patch.
-
If your patch will induce a major compatibility break, or has a design component that deserves extended discussion or debate among the wider OIIO community, then it may be prudent to email oiio-dev pointing everybody to the pull request URL and discussing any issues you think are important.
-
All pull requests automatically launch CI jobs on GitHub Actions to ensure that the build completes and that the tests suite runs correctly, for a varity of platform, compiler, library, and flag combinations. The status of the CI tests for your PR will be displayed on the GitHub PR page. We will not accept PRs that don't build cleanly or pass the existing testsuite.
-
The reviewer will look over the code and critique on the "comments" area. Reviewers may ask for changes, explain problems they found, congratulate the author on a clever solution, etc. But until somebody says "LGTM" (looks good to me), the code should not be committed. Sometimes this takes a few rounds of give and take. Please don't take it hard if your first try is not accepted. It happens to all of us.
-
After approval, one of the senior developers (with commit approval to the official main repository) will merge your fixes into the master branch.
We use clang-format to uniformly format our source code prior to PR submission. Make sure that clang-format is installed on your local machine, and just run
make clang-format
and it will automatically reformat your code according to the configuration
file found in the .clang-format
file at the root directory of the OIIO
source code checkout.
One of the CI test matrix entries runs clang-format and fails if any
diffs were generated (that is, if any of your code did not 100% conform to
the .clang-format
formatting configuration). If it fails, clicking on that
test log will show you the diffs generated, so that you can easily correct
it on your end and update the PR with the formatting fixes.
If you don't have clang-format set up on your machine, and your patch is not very long, you may find that it's more convenient to just submit it and hope for the best, and if it doesn't pass the CI test, look at the diffs in the log and make the corrections by hand and then submit an update to the patch (i.e. relying on CI to run clang-format for you).
Because the basic formatting is automated by clang-format, we won't enumerate the rules here.
C++ implementation should be named *.cpp
. Headers should be named .h
.
All headers should contain
#pragma once
All source files should begin with the copyright and license, which can be found in the LICENSE.md file (or cut and pasted from any other other source file).
For NEW source files, please change the copyright year to the present. DO NOT edit existing files only to update the copyright year, it just creates pointless deltas and offers no increased protection.
In general, classes and templates should start with upper case and
capitalize new words: class CustomerList;
In general, local variables
should start with lower case. Macros should be ALL_CAPS
, if used at all.
If your class is extremely similar to, or modeled after, something in the standard library, Boost, or something else we interoperate with, it's ok to use their naming conventions. For example, very general utility classes and templates (the kind of thing you would normally find in std or boost) should be lower case with underscores separating words, as they would be if they were standards.
template <class T> shared_ptr;
class scoped_mutex;
Names of data should generally be nouns. Functions/methods are trickier: a the name of a function that returns a value but has no side effects should be a noun, but a procedure that performs an action should be a verb.
Try to avoid public data members, although there are some classes that serve a role similar to a simple C struct -- a very straightforward collection of data members. In these, it's fine to make the data members public and have clients set and get them directly.
Private member data should be named m_foo (alternately, it's ok to use the common practice of member data foo_, but don't mix the conventions within a class).
Private member data that needs public accessors should use the convention:
void foo (const T& newfoo) { m_foo = newfoo; }
const T& foo () const { return m_foo; }
Avoid multiple inheritance.
Namespaces: yes, use them!
Prefer C++11 std
rather than Boost, where both can do the same task.
Feel free to use Boost classes you already see in the code base, but don't
use any Boost you don't see us already using, without first checking with
the project leader.
Please do use IlmBase vector, matrix, and utility classes where applicable. Don't write your own vector or matrix code!
Use these libraries for OIIO internals, but please DO NOT require them in any of our main external APIs unless it's been thoroughly discussed and approved by the group.
Comment philosophy: try to be clear, try to help teach the reader what's going on in your code.
Prefer C++ comments (starting line with //
) rather than C comments (/* ... */
).
For public APIs we tend to use Doxygen-style comments (start with ///
).
They looks like this:
/// Explanation of a class. Note THREE slashes!
class myclass {
....
float foo; ///< Doxygen comments on same line look like this
}
Macros should be used only rarely -- prefer inline functions, templates, enums, or "const" values wherever possible.
Prefer std::unique_ptr
over raw new/delete.
When in doubt, look elsewhere in the code base for examples of similar structures and try to format your code in the same manner, or ask on the oiio-dev mail list.