-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 340
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue with di.xml - How to treat it ? #2436
Comments
Hi, Compatibility with third-party modules is out of the scope of our Open Source support policy provided here, there is not much we can do for your issue. If the fix given by Aheadworks is fixing your issue, I suggest you continue using it. If that's not the case, you'll have to discuss with Aheadworks how the two extensions can live together. That being said, "shop by brand" feature can be easily achieve with these two additional modules : https://github.com/Smile-SA/magento2-module-custom-entity Regards |
Merci Romain for all those details. All clear. But maybe I have one last advise to request from you.
Thanks for your feedbacks. François |
Dear Romain, quick update in order to inform you that the fix provided by aheadworks to the di.xml file is functional, and has resolved the problem. Do you confirm that this enhancement they provided is not required to be considered for ElasticSuite roadmap itself ? |
Hello team
We have elasticsuite 2.10.8.1 installed on Magento 2.3-p1
Last weekend we installed an extension "Shop by brand" from Aheadworks.
During the configuration of the extension, we noticed a bug on the brand pages.
For example: https://ie.technostok.com/darantasia.html
Aheadworks propose us to correct the di.xml at path public_html/vendor/smile/elasticsuite/src/module-elasticsuite-catalog/etc
Their file is different from the native elasticuite file, and i created a Diff-Checker link which highlight those differences.
See here: https://www.diffchecker.com/9YLqEbz7
Question: Does this require to be reported as a bug in Elasticsuite git, or is the fix proposed by aheadworks legitimate to implement?
I'd like to have your opinion before proceeding the next steps.
Thanks in advance
.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: