From 7d2366158f7f6604ce2b490ef3ed7fc11425b470 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fenway-snx <181822346+Fenway-snx@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 05:39:04 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] Status change and fix formatting error --- content/sips/sip-408.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/sips/sip-408.md b/content/sips/sip-408.md index 1bfd9d1e6..03080a733 100644 --- a/content/sips/sip-408.md +++ b/content/sips/sip-408.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ sip: 408 title: Synthetix Referendum author: Fenway -status: Draft +status: Implemented created: 2024-09-17T00:00:00.000Z network: Ethereum type: Meta-Governance @@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ The SIP aims to improve the governance structure of the Synthetix protocol by in ## Motivation To make Synthetix governance more robust, there must be a mechanism for SNX token holders to vote on proposals (i.e. Referendums). There are two important scenarios where a referendum can be effective and improve the robustness of Synthetix Governance: ---1. The Spartan Council can refer proposals of the utmost significance to the ultimate Synthetix stakeholder, the SNX token holder. ---2. Proposals that may conflict with or not be aligned with the perspectives or motivations of the Spartan Council can be proposed via a referendum. +1. The Spartan Council can refer proposals of the utmost significance to the ultimate Synthetix stakeholder, the SNX token holder. +2. Proposals that may conflict with or not be aligned with the perspectives or motivations of the Spartan Council can be proposed via a referendum. ## Specification A SNX token holder referendum can be proposed by any community member. For an SR to be merged and included on the SIP website, proof of a soft quorum (i.e. 10m SNX - configurable by SCCP) must be provided to a SIP editor. This prevents spam referendums and ensures community discussion is focused on impactful and supported change.