Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

problem with reactions added after gapfilling (PR #185) #225

Closed
2 of 4 tasks
dtmvandenberg opened this issue Jun 4, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #241
Closed
2 of 4 tasks

problem with reactions added after gapfilling (PR #185) #225

dtmvandenberg opened this issue Jun 4, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #241
Assignees
Labels
bug something is wrong in the model fixed in devel this issue is already fixed in devel and will be closed after the next release format fix things associated to format of any of the model/data/script files

Comments

@dtmvandenberg
Copy link

dtmvandenberg commented Jun 4, 2020

Description of the issue:

The MetaNetX ID's of reactions r_4601 till r_4628 are in the model.rxnNotes table instead of model.rxnMetaNetXID in the matlab file of version 8.3.5.

Expected feature/value/output:

model.rxnNotes: 'NOTES: added after Gapfilling (PR #185)'
model.rxnMetaNetXID: 'MNXR94845'

Current feature/value/output:

model.rxnNotes: 'NOTES: added after Gapfilling (PR #185); MNXR94845'
model.rxnMetaNetXID: ''

Reproducing these results:

No code needed just check the model after loading the matlab file.

I hereby confirm that I have:

  • Tested my code with all requirements for running the model
  • Done this analysis in the master branch of the repository
  • Checked that a similar issue does not exist already
  • If needed, asked first in the Gitter chat room about the issue
@BenjaSanchez BenjaSanchez added bug something is wrong in the model format fix things associated to format of any of the model/data/script files help wanted feel free to help us solving this issue! labels Jun 4, 2020
@BenjaSanchez
Copy link
Contributor

@dtmvandenberg thanks for bringing this up! we will address it soon in a fix branch. @feiranl do you think this might have happened with any other of the additions?

@feiranl
Copy link
Collaborator

feiranl commented Jun 4, 2020

will fix this. There is an index issue in the original function. However, there are some cases which we do have MNXR IDs in the notes, which is when they are not exactly same with our reactions, so we move the original MNX IDs to the note filed for correctness.

@feiranl
Copy link
Collaborator

feiranl commented Jun 4, 2020

Fix this in the new pull request #226, bigg IDs for those rxns are also updated.

@BenjaSanchez BenjaSanchez added wip work in progress and removed help wanted feel free to help us solving this issue! labels Jun 18, 2020
@BenjaSanchez BenjaSanchez added fixed in devel this issue is already fixed in devel and will be closed after the next release and removed wip work in progress labels Jun 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug something is wrong in the model fixed in devel this issue is already fixed in devel and will be closed after the next release format fix things associated to format of any of the model/data/script files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants