-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add more WQ data ts plots #2
Comments
Looking at the merged file, I see some differences and inconsistencies with program names, so I think it will be best to use the individual .csv files for each parameter. |
@dotis : I tried adding additional plots but ran into an issue. I think the issue is that some of the wq parameters may not be coming from the same stations. This could be the same name inconsistencies you were seeing in the other file. Here is an example line from
We can add more stations to the map but we will need details for those stations added to |
Looking at the merged file with all wq params, I see that this is more comprehensive than the individual param files and includes lat/lon for each site. Perhaps it is actually better to use this file. I will ask Alex Fine at AOML. @7yl4r can we ingest from a large file (~64MB)? Currently, it is in .csv format. Or, do we need to break it up into smaller chunks? |
<100MB is acceptable, <50MB is preferred. Drop it in https://github.com/7yl4r/wq-dash/tree/master/data and we'll see. |
GH says, "No". "Yowza, that’s a big file. Try again with a file smaller than 25MB." |
@7yl4r There are two main formats for the WQ data. There is a .csv file for each param (chl, turb, nitrogen, silica, etc.) or there is a merged .csv with all of them in the same file. I'm not sure which will be easier to ingest by this tool. The merged file is fairly large (~64MB, ~600,000 rows).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: