Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zits on curved walls #4860

Closed
rlesac opened this issue Nov 22, 2018 · 17 comments
Closed

Zits on curved walls #4860

rlesac opened this issue Nov 22, 2018 · 17 comments
Labels
Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior.

Comments

@rlesac
Copy link

rlesac commented Nov 22, 2018

I have an issue with printing curved walls.
It manifests as zits on walls.

The zits are always in the same position and most settings I tried have no effect on them.
Using other slicers (Slic3r, Simplfy3D) produces smooth walls.

The results are entirely reproducible between changing filament, nozzles, PTFE tube.

An extreme example:
cura-vs-s3d

Simple test STL:
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3229413

Simplify3D on top, Cura middle and bottom. Setting z seam to user defined got rid of some zits in the sides of the oval, but others still persist.

  1. Simplfy3D
  2. z seam set to user defined
  3. z seam set to shortest
    20181121_231952

20181121_232026

Settings changed, from top to bottom:
18. combing off
16. reset to draft profile, extra prime amount to 0.4 (to counteract under extrusion after long travel, has no impact on the zits)
13. z seam alignment to sharpest
12. z seam alignment to shortest
20181121_190137

MF file
CE3_Test retraction-extra prime amount v1.zip

Application Version
Cura 3.6

Platform
Win10 x64

Printer
Ender 3 stock.

Steps to Reproduce
Slice the file and print.

Actual Results
Zits and bumps on the walls

Expected results
Smooth walls

Additional Information

@rlesac
Copy link
Author

rlesac commented Nov 22, 2018

They even show up when printing the oval ring without the pins.
Always in the same place.
20181122_193042
20181122_192955

@rlesac
Copy link
Author

rlesac commented Nov 25, 2018

I also found new artifacts, vertical lines. Looking at the printer it seems to slow down in those places.
S3D also printed 40% faster.

S3d left and top. Cura right an bottom. Uh seems my photos got rotated upside down. Anyway, Cura is the one with all the zits.
20181125_164409
20181125_164300
20181125_164127

Vertical lines:
20181125_165312
20181125_165302

@Liger0
Copy link

Liger0 commented Nov 26, 2018

Apart of the parts which need coasting and extra restart, I have the behaviour you have in your latest image on the right side too, that is very annoying.

@rlesac
Copy link
Author

rlesac commented Nov 26, 2018

Worse than annoying. I would switch to S3D if it was not so lagging with other features.
I've since switched to Klipper firmware so I don't need the extra restart and coasting.
But that the original issue still remains and some new defects are cropping up, only in Cura.

Researching the issue, it would seems to affect a lot of people, but most chalk it up to a bad extruder/PTFE tube/hotend what have you and just live with it.

@rlesac
Copy link
Author

rlesac commented Nov 26, 2018

Apart of the parts which need coasting and extra restart, I have the behaviour you have in your layers image on the right side too, that is very annoying.

If you can, print the https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3229413 test and post photos. It's a fast and cheap 4 minute print.

@Appesteijn
Copy link
Contributor

Appesteijn commented Nov 26, 2018

Cura 3.6.0, Default 0.10 profile & S5:

2018-11-26 11 54 43

@rlesac
Copy link
Author

rlesac commented Nov 27, 2018

Cura 3.6.0, Default 0.10 profile & S5:

2018-11-26 11 54 43
So much brim :)

I don't see any zits on your print.
Different layer heights produced different results with 0.2 being the worst and is my most often used layer height.

Do you have any ideas what could be causing such different behavior compared to other slicers?

I'll try some more test prints tomorrow.

@Appesteijn
Copy link
Contributor

So this is Cura 3.6 with 0.2 layerheight on a S5
2018-11-27 15 53 28

@rlesac
Copy link
Author

rlesac commented Nov 27, 2018

So this is Cura 3.6 with 0.2 layerheight on a S5
2018-11-27 15 53 28

This one seems to have the aforementioned zits on the walls, but it's hard to tell.
I have since switched from Marlin to Klipper firmware, and can't reproduce them with this test, I am getting different kind of artifacts, namely vertical lines.

But in other prints, more complex ones, they show up, as shown in the Star Trek cookie cutter.

cc-star-trek-emblem-captain-70mm.zip

Only in Cura. Both Slic3r and Simplify3D are free of such defects.

I'm in the middle of a long print, so can¨do test at the moment.

@Bobertso
Copy link

vertex zits
I have the same issue, found the cause by printing a lower resolution stl of my object. The zits are the model's vertexes, Cura's doing something weird at a vertex to make them. (low resolution on left, standard on right )

Solved by exporting model at extremely high resolution.

@Liger0
Copy link

Liger0 commented Dec 20, 2018

I even noticed weird behaviorus that show the inprecision of the skirt. Maybe this is related.
vertex

@cshunt
Copy link

cshunt commented Dec 21, 2018

I think the zits are start/stops on layer change. I ran a couple test and if you set z seam to aligned I had them show up all in one row. I tried adjusting retract extra prime amount without success, this had helped in 3.4. Retract at layer change did not help. I thought it might be overlap at layer start/stop, coasting changed the shape of the zit.

Settings i have tried to adjust
Retract extra prime amount - worked in previous versions
retract on layer change - no change
z-seam location - this lined the zits up.
coasting

@tablatronix
Copy link

What was the outcome of this, anyone resolve this, I seem to have this on certain layer heights and z seam settings

@alfrix
Copy link

alfrix commented Jun 9, 2019

i have come across this yesterday printing a cylinder, i solved it by disabling "Compensate wall overlaps"

@tablatronix
Copy link

Ill try that, I am printing lots of cylinders

@nallath
Copy link
Member

nallath commented Nov 26, 2020

This is probably a combination of compensate wall overlaps and the resolution settings. A much more in depth writeup can be found on #8321

@nallath nallath closed this as completed Nov 26, 2020
@nallath nallath added the Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior. label Nov 26, 2020
@tablatronix
Copy link

Thanks, related ? #6676

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants