Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

swap-router-contracts vs. periphery contracts #48

Open
jpeer opened this issue May 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

swap-router-contracts vs. periphery contracts #48

jpeer opened this issue May 14, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@jpeer
Copy link

jpeer commented May 14, 2022

not a bug or feature request, just a question, namely: what is the problem that swap-router-contracts is solving compared to uniswap's already existing routers?

is it to provide a more convenient and possibly unified API?
is it to provide a more concise API, that is only concerned with swapping (and not liquidity providing)?
is it to safe gas, or solve some other technical issues with pure routers?

thanks in advance for any infos!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant