Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple Tunnels Open at Once #8

Closed
T313C0mun1s7 opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Multiple Tunnels Open at Once #8

T313C0mun1s7 opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@T313C0mun1s7
Copy link

I have three tunnels. Two are to the local LAN of remote offices, and one is to an EC2 instance on AWS. There are no overlaps in the remote LAN subnets, or the tunnel subnets. The AWS instance has a Allow IPs of 0.0.0.0/0 and becomes my internet gateway. The remote offices have Allow IPs set for the subnet scope of the remote LAN and only become a route for that remote LAN. All tunnels work as they should independently. However, if I have a tunnel active and I activate a different tunnel, the active one deactivates. In web form terms, they act like radio select bubbles, and not check boxes. Is there any way to get WireGUIrd to to let me have all three active at the same time?

Thank you.

@T313C0mun1s7
Copy link
Author

I have confirmed that if I open both tunnels at the same time from the shell, using wg-quick they work as intended. Also, I have added FwMark = 51820 to the [Interface] Section of the config for the tunnel that does not become my default gateway as per this: https://casavant.org/2020/10/10/wireguard-fwmark.html and works with no issues at all.

@pkoevesdi
Copy link

pkoevesdi commented Feb 22, 2023

I can confirm: normally I can activate both of my tunnels with wg-quick, with wireguird I can't. I can even activate one in Wireguird and the other with wg-quick, but not both in wireguird.

@UnnoTed
Copy link
Owner

UnnoTed commented Mar 30, 2023

Added an option to enable multiple tunnels in the new settings window.

@UnnoTed UnnoTed closed this as completed Mar 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants