You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 19, 2018. It is now read-only.
Even though requiresCancelable=false allows scrolling to proceed without blocking on JS, that should not mean that developers will see the touch events at a location/target different from what the user actually touched. Hit testing behavior / observable event ordering must remain the same. This should fall out naturally in chromium due to the design of threaded scrolling and (since hit-testing isn't specified) is probably out of scope for this document. But maybe a note is deserved? It should be easy to create a test page that demonstrates this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Keeping this open on me for now to build a test page for this once @dtapuska has a working implementation in chromium. I doubt we'll want to add anything to the spec, but it's worth exploring further.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Even though requiresCancelable=false allows scrolling to proceed without blocking on JS, that should not mean that developers will see the touch events at a location/target different from what the user actually touched. Hit testing behavior / observable event ordering must remain the same. This should fall out naturally in chromium due to the design of threaded scrolling and (since hit-testing isn't specified) is probably out of scope for this document. But maybe a note is deserved? It should be easy to create a test page that demonstrates this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: