You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I propose that we add an optional field event_level_epsilon to event-level source registration. This field would replace the existing randomized response epsilon vendor-specific value, and replace that with something like a “maximum randomized response epsilon”, which event_level_epsilon could not exceed without the source failing to register. The default event_level_epsilon will be this maximum vendor-specific value.
The benefit of this approach is that:
it allows API callers to experiment with different privacy levels
it allows privacy-conscious API callers to optionally deploy more private versions of the API
it allows callers to invoke the API consistently across multiple interoperable implementations, even if each implementation chooses a different maximum epsilon
it aligns with the design of the aggregation service, which allows specifying an epsilon up to a maximum
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I propose that we add an optional field
event_level_epsilon
to event-level source registration. This field would replace the existing randomized response epsilon vendor-specific value, and replace that with something like a “maximum randomized response epsilon”, whichevent_level_epsilon
could not exceed without the source failing to register. The defaultevent_level_epsilon
will be this maximum vendor-specific value.The benefit of this approach is that:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: