Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

select files to scan based on filename #1425

Closed
Omertron opened this issue Mar 15, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

select files to scan based on filename #1425

Omertron opened this issue Mar 15, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@Omertron
Copy link
Member

Original issue 1426 created by Omertron on 2010-04-14T21:31:13.000Z:

I would like yamj to scan only certain files from a directory. Selection should be based on keywords in the filename. Example: dumbo_1950_kids.mkv and hostel_2005_adult.mkv where kids and adult are the (user defined) keywords.

@Omertron
Copy link
Member Author

Comment #1 originally posted by Omertron on 2010-04-14T23:37:01.000Z:

See in the library.xml:

http://code.google.com/p/moviejukebox/wiki/LibraryXMLInfo

@Omertron
Copy link
Member Author

Comment #2 originally posted by Omertron on 2010-04-16T19:48:30.000Z:

With the exclude tag, it's more or less possible to do what I want. But I would like
to be able to do the reverse thing. A sort of include tag.

If such a tag would exist, it would be much easier to generate a jukebox with only
one of the keywords in it by including that tag then by excluding the other tags. The
combination of the two tags should give a pretty powerfull control over the creation
of jukeboxes.

So my request stays: is it possible to add an 'include' tag?

@Omertron
Copy link
Member Author

Comment #3 originally posted by Omertron on 2010-05-09T09:35:00.000Z:

So you basically want an section; and it should be the inverse of
?

Presumeably YAMJ's behaviour to generate it's list of movies would then be:-

  1. Find all movies found in
  2. REMOVE movies that DON'T match the filter.
  3. REMOVE movies that DO match the filter.

I could make use of that.

@Omertron
Copy link
Member Author

Comment #4 originally posted by Omertron on 2010-05-10T23:28:02.000Z:

That's it. I think it would add a lot of flexibility to YAMJ!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant