-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Set sorting not correct from r3226 #2531
Comments
Comment #1 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-11-28T08:04:11.000Z: <empty> |
Comment #2 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-11-28T13:40:00.000Z: starred issue, still exists in r3262 |
Comment #3 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-22T16:06:25.000Z: This issue was closed by revision r3398. |
Comment #4 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-22T17:48:13.000Z: Just upgraded to r3399 an still not working after creating full new jukebox |
Comment #5 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-22T18:12:12.000Z: Not working for me too :( (after upgraded and created new jukebox) |
Comment #6 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-22T19:20:54.000Z: did you rebuild the indexes? |
Comment #7 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-22T19:25:09.000Z: Yes, I deleted the entire jukebox folder and created from scratch. That was after trying an index overwrite and an html/xml overwrite. |
Comment #8 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-22T19:55:43.000Z: In the first time I tried overwrite old base and second time I deleted old base and created new one. Sorting for sets not working correctly. |
Comment #9 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-30T12:58:05.000Z: I have also tried this using r3416 with my existing jukebox and with a new one created from scratch - definitely still sorting using movie names rather than set names. |
Comment #10 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-30T17:23:02.000Z: Yes, confirmed it's an issue. Just trying to work out how to get the correct sorting given the conflict between TV shows, movies, nfo files, etc. |
Comment #11 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-30T19:35:38.000Z: This issue was closed by revision r3418. |
Comment #12 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-30T20:13:42.000Z: For movies sets working correctly For series sets not correctly. :( PS: many years we don't have any problem with sorting sets. but now have :( |
Comment #13 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-31T17:01:15.000Z: It's difficult to choose the right sort based on the NFO information and other information. Why are you naming a tv show "1 season"? |
Comment #14 originally posted by Omertron on 2012-12-31T17:20:09.000Z: One more example: I have 5 seasons show "Barboskiny" Until version 3225 sorting was by show name i.e. Barboskiny (letter B) Maybe you can make some switch in propoerties file for change sorting (don't change titlesort for tvshow)? titlesort in nfo now not working for tvshow sets |
Comment #15 originally posted by Omertron on 2013-05-08T13:18:59.000Z: Please provide the NFO files you are using for this show, I can't recreate it |
Comment #16 originally posted by Omertron on 2013-08-09T18:48:07.000Z: I solved the problem using the in the nfo file for series sets. Thanks for your work!!!! |
Comment #17 originally posted by Omertron on 2013-08-09T19:18:20.000Z: <empty> |
Comment #18 originally posted by Omertron on 2013-10-31T23:27:15.000Z: This appears to be an issue again that I just noticed. Still on older version r3700 |
Original issue 2532 created by Omertron on 2012-11-23T21:49:19.000Z:
Including version 3225 sort of sets was by name set. It was correct.
Starting with version 3226 sorting is by name of the first movie in the set. This is not correct.
for example I have sets:
Barboskiny
Superpapa
Tvoy drug
Tri bogatirya
Ivan Tcarevich
Dobrynya Nikitich
Until version 3225 I have correct sorting:
Barboskiny
Tri bogatirya
From version 3226 I have backward sorting
Tri bogatirya (because firts movie start from letter "I")
Barboskiny
In all xml (other_all,library****.xml ) I have in <titlesort> name of first movie in the SET ,instead SET name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: