You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 15, 2020. It is now read-only.
And I got the following result. Note that the hole is normally below the polygon in which it belongs, but I brought it up and colored it red.
It seems that some polygons try to use the hole with an OuterNFP instead of an innerNFP. I searched a little bit, but I did not find what could be possibly wrong.
When the polygons have no rotations, everything goes like expected and the hole is filled properly.
Do you have any idea what could be the issue or what I am doing wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hello.
Massive thanks for this code contribution.
I was playing around with the use_holes option and got some very strange results.
I used this code. It adds 2 big squares, a square hole in one of them and 4 little squares that should fit into the hole.
And I got the following result. Note that the hole is normally below the polygon in which it belongs, but I brought it up and colored it red.
It seems that some polygons try to use the hole with an OuterNFP instead of an innerNFP. I searched a little bit, but I did not find what could be possibly wrong.
When the polygons have no rotations, everything goes like expected and the hole is filled properly.
Do you have any idea what could be the issue or what I am doing wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: