Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

False positive for version #102

Open
Josue-T opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

False positive for version #102

Josue-T opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@Josue-T
Copy link
Contributor

Josue-T commented Jan 19, 2022

Problem

Package linter don't like this version but should be accepted
4-5.7~ynh1

I've the issue for the app pgadmin.

@Josue-T Josue-T added the bug label Jan 19, 2022
@alexAubin
Copy link
Member

Zbleh yeah ... but on the other hand it really simplifies stuff to have a clearly defined format for version ...

I had a hard time finding out that in this case, 4-5.7 refers to the fact that the software is in fact "pgadmin 4" (as their site says), with version 5.7. To me that's just unecessarily confusing for everybody ... Like you go on their website and they say "The pgAdmin Development Team is pleased to announce pgAdmin 4 version 6.4" .. what's the version number : is it 4 ? is it 6 ? Is it 4.6 ?

Imho in this case we should just stick with version=5.7~ynh1. I doubt that they will ever move to a new "pgadmin 5". If they do, this may be a totally different software that needs a different package. (I mean apparently pgadmin 3 was a desktop app). If we think about mailman : we called it "mailman2_ynh" and "mailman3_ynh", we didn't create just "mailman_ynh" with "version 2-x.y" because anyway these are very different softwares

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants