Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSW - Belt Linking does not return unspent rounds #9233

Closed
LinkIsGrim opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #10148 · May be fixed by #9234
Closed

CSW - Belt Linking does not return unspent rounds #9233

LinkIsGrim opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #10148 · May be fixed by #9234
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@LinkIsGrim
Copy link
Contributor

LinkIsGrim commented Jun 29, 2023

Mods (complete and add to the following information):

  • Arma 3: 2.12
  • CBA: 3.15.8
  • ACE3: 22b93e2

Description:
Linking belts with CSW does not return unspent ammunition to the mag source when it is a GroundWeaponHolder.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Create mission with player and a static weapon, with CSW ammo handling enabled and ammo storage set to "Ground".
  2. Fire a few rounds with the static weapon, but don't empty the magazine.
  3. Link the belt on the static weapon. Fresh magazine from the magSource will be removed, but unspent rounds from it will not be readded.

Expected behavior:
Same behavior as ace_reload belt linking.

Where did the issue occur?

  • Dedicated / Singleplayer

Log Files:

  • No relevant RPT, unimplemented behavior.

Additional context:
Add any other context about the problem here.

Screenshots:
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

@LinkIsGrim LinkIsGrim added this to the 3.16.0 milestone Jul 12, 2023
@LinkIsGrim LinkIsGrim modified the milestones: 3.16.0, 3.16.1 Sep 5, 2023
@PabstMirror PabstMirror modified the milestones: 3.16.1, Ongoing Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants