You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Could it be the case that edge costs are calculated from beeline distances (start node to end node distance) instead of the real line string length here
Or did I misunderstand the concept of the edge cost? My understanding is that the edge cost should be proportional to the travel time, so the real length should be used .
All the best
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Indeed - this seems to have been introduced last year. Previously, the logic here was to first compute the costs on the uncollapsed edges, and adding them up during the subsequent collapsing.
This explains some strange results I noticed during the last months. Thanks for pointing that out!
Dear pfaedle developers,
Could it be the case that edge costs are calculated from beeline distances (start node to end node distance) instead of the real line string length here
pfaedle/src/pfaedle/osm/OsmBuilder.cpp
Line 1122 in 6467076
Or did I misunderstand the concept of the edge cost? My understanding is that the edge cost should be proportional to the travel time, so the real length should be used .
All the best
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: