Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Definition for breed identifier scheme #168

Closed
ahokkonen opened this issue Oct 13, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Definition for breed identifier scheme #168

ahokkonen opened this issue Oct 13, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
stale-issue Identifies that an issue is stale and will be closed unless reactivated.

Comments

@ahokkonen
Copy link
Contributor

Should some of the commonly used breed standards be defined in the ADE standard schemas?
Like ones used in interbull https://interbull.org/ib/icarbreedcodes ?

@cookeac
Copy link
Collaborator

cookeac commented Oct 22, 2020

Some time ago we compiled a list using the interbull codes, other ICAR references, and then more international breeds. It is far from complete (there are several hundred for some species). That list is on the DataLinker web site at present.

@ahokkonen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is it so that ADE group is looking for combining all possible cattle breeds under one schema?
For our cases we need to work only with a breeds within the integrated systems - so we need to define country/organization specific breed sets for each case

@cookeac
Copy link
Collaborator

cookeac commented Jan 28, 2021

icarBreedIdentifierType is an identifier with a scheme and id as you have noted, this makes it possible to define and use country-, organisation-, or application-specific schemes if required.

However, the ICAR Guidelines already define a set of breed codes (as also noted above), so we could define a scheme to identify these. Encouraging implementers to use the ICAR standard codes will enhance interoperability overall. However as noted, that list is incomplete and there would benefit in ICAR maintaining a more complete list. Is this something we should take up with the wider ADE working group?

@cookeac
Copy link
Collaborator

cookeac commented Jan 28, 2021

See also dynamic queries of lists in #109

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 23, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale-issue Identifies that an issue is stale and will be closed unless reactivated. label Sep 23, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Oct 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stale-issue Identifies that an issue is stale and will be closed unless reactivated.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants