-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compare with RazorLight. #58
Comments
Hi! First of all I appreciate toddams's work and it's great to have a choice of what library to use. RazorLight as I see it, although it can render strings, it is aiming to be view engine framework detached from MVC relying on files a lot. At a time I started RazorEngineCore I was looking for a library to be able:
noone was able to provide that, so I did RazorEngineCore |
Great answer. |
|
Is that true @adoconnection regarding no html encoding by default? That's a bit of a deal breaker for me as we've got client input being sent around by emails. RazorLight looks a little unmaintained for my liking though, has been on rc forever. Rock and a hard place at the moment. |
Also noticed that indeed.
See #65. But those are work arounds and won't work for every case. Also it uses a prerelease package |
I have updated #65 to keep HTML safety discussion in one issue. |
I have started wiki page to close this issue. https://github.com/adoconnection/RazorEngineCore/wiki/Package-comparison |
Could you please add to Readme comparison, why someone should choose your library compare to https://github.com/toddams/RazorLight.
Just as curiosity, what was the reason to create an alternative library, when one similar already existed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: