You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
They seem unnecessary, since all these algebraic structures expose an is-set field through the inheritance mechanism of the Is<Something> records already (as demonstrated in #1033). Also note that some structures are missing, e.g. Monoid.
I would say it is better to directly use is-set everywhere (and I would be willing to implement that change). Are there other opinions on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree. One could be unhappy about "public" use of 'is-set' which is not in line with the naming conventions. I am not though. Especially when thinking of using instance resolution to prove h-levels in the future.
I propose to delete the following lemmas:
They seem unnecessary, since all these algebraic structures expose an
is-set
field through the inheritance mechanism of theIs<Something>
records already (as demonstrated in #1033). Also note that some structures are missing, e.g.Monoid
.I would say it is better to directly use
is-set
everywhere (and I would be willing to implement that change). Are there other opinions on this?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: