-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Whitehead product #640
Whitehead product #640
Conversation
Very nice stuff! We are much closer towards Brunerie’s full paper, which I am really interested in. Have you ever formalized anything about James construction? I wrote some codes on that, but only containing a few basic properties. |
I think that'd be the next step. My plan now is to first look into whether James could be avoided in the proof of lemma 3.4.4 for the case n = 2 (although only briefly, since this is probably too good to be true...) I wrote some James stuff last year, but I remember I ran into some strange termination issues. So if you have something, I'd be really interested!:-) |
Where can we find your code on the James construction? I had a look and found a branch on your fork called "james", but I could not locate the new code |
@mortberg I haven't upload the codes since it still has holes to fill in... I will keep on trying when I have some time. |
This PR contains:
W : A * B → A ∨ B
and a charaterisation of cofibres of W. (Prop 3.3.2. in Brunerie 2016).Π∙
which I for some reason thought might be useful in the future.