Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Even got better results? How? #7

Open
breadacker opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Even got better results? How? #7

breadacker opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@breadacker
Copy link

I had tried running FreTS model on ETTm1 and ETTh1 datasets with both univariate and multivariate forecasting tasks. The following results are even better than the results mentioned in your article. How is that possible?

---Hyperparameters---
Used MS or S for features
Used freq as detailed like 1min rathen than t as minutely
Used other settings as default given by you

---GPU--
RTX 3060 6GB

Univariate ETTh1 Test Results
mse:0.002602622378617525, mae:0.03822975605726242, rmse:0.05101590231060982

Multivariate ETTh1 Test Results
mse:0.002601700136438012, mae:0.038223933428525925, rmse:0.05100686475634575

Univariate ETTm1 Test Results
mse:0.0011898829834535718, mae:0.025772279128432274, rmse:0.03449467942118645

Multivariate ETTm1 Test Results
mse:0.0012134966673329473, mae:0.026144789531826973, rmse:0.03483527898788452

@abaklykov
Copy link

Where did you get these two datasets?

@breadacker
Copy link
Author

https://github.com/zhouhaoyi/ETDataset/tree/main/ETT-small

Where did you get these two datasets?

@abaklykov
Copy link

Wow! Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants