Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added highlighting for TIES keyword introduced in PostgreSQL 13 #5033

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 24, 2023

Conversation

rozhnev
Copy link
Contributor

@rozhnev rozhnev commented Jan 22, 2023

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:
Added highlighting for TIES keyword introduced in PostgreSQL 13

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 86.11% // Head: 86.11% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (5089c27) compared to base (1e0b5a9).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5033   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.11%   86.11%           
=======================================
  Files         546      546           
  Lines       41627    41627           
  Branches     6555     6555           
=======================================
  Hits        35847    35847           
  Misses       5780     5780           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 86.11% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/mode/pgsql_highlight_rules.js 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@nightwing
Copy link
Member

Looks good, but what are the other commits included in the pull request?

@rozhnev
Copy link
Contributor Author

rozhnev commented Jan 24, 2023

It was accidentally merge of dev branch

@andrewnester andrewnester merged commit 9588086 into ajaxorg:master Jan 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants