forked from havanagrawal/Leetcode
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
_410.java
93 lines (83 loc) · 3.25 KB
/
_410.java
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
package com.fishercoder.solutions;
/**
* 410. Split Array Largest Sum
*
* Given an array which consists of non-negative integers and an integer m,
* you can split the array into m non-empty continuous subarrays.
* Write an algorithm to minimize the largest sum among these m subarrays.
Note:
If n is the length of array, assume the following constraints are satisfied:
1 ≤ n ≤ 1000
1 ≤ m ≤ min(50, n)
Examples:
Input:
nums = [7,2,5,10,8]
m = 2
Output:
18
Explanation:
There are four ways to split nums into two subarrays.
The best way is to split it into [7,2,5] and [10,8],
where the largest sum among the two subarrays is only 18.
*/
public class _410 {
public static class Solution1 {
/**
* credit: https://discuss.leetcode.com/topic/61324/clear-explanation-8ms-binary-search-java
*
* The answer is between maximum value of input array numbers and sum of those numbers. Use
* binary search to approach the correct answer. We have l = max number of array; r = sum of all
* numbers in the array; Every time we do mid = (l + r) / 2;
*
* Use greedy to narrow down left and right boundaries in binary search. 3.1 Cut the array from
* left. 3.2 Try our best to make sure that the sum of numbers between each two cuts (inclusive)
* is large enough but still less than mid. 3.3 We'll end up with two results: either we can
* divide the array into more than m subarrays or we cannot. If we can, it means that the mid
* value we pick is too small because we've already tried our best to make sure each part holds
* as many non-negative numbers as we can but we still have numbers left. So, it is impossible
* to cut the array into m parts and make sure each parts is no larger than mid. We should
* increase m. This leads to l = mid + 1; If we can't, it is either we successfully divide the
* array into m parts and the sum of each part is less than mid, or we used up all numbers
* before we reach m. Both of them mean that we should lower mid because we need to find the
* minimum one. This leads to r = mid - 1;
*/
public int splitArray(int[] nums, int m) {
int max = 0;
long sum = 0;
for (int num : nums) {
max = Math.max(num, max);
sum += num;
}
if (m == 1) {
return (int) sum;
}
//binary search
long l = max;
long r = sum;
while (l <= r) {
long mid = (l + r) / 2;
if (valid(mid, nums, m)) {
r = mid - 1;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
return (int) l;
}
public boolean valid(long target, int[] nums, int m) {
int count = 1;
long total = 0;
for (int num : nums) {
total += num;
if (total > target) {
total = num;
count++;
if (count > m) {
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}
}
}