Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: fix image inspect and network inspect command docs #1053

Merged

Conversation

HusterWan
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Michael Wan zirenwan@gmail.com

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Describe how you did it

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

Signed-off-by: Michael Wan <zirenwan@gmail.com>
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1053 into master will decrease coverage by 0.32%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1053      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   16.14%   15.82%   -0.33%     
==========================================
  Files         140      140              
  Lines        8535     8512      -23     
==========================================
- Hits         1378     1347      -31     
- Misses       7056     7062       +6     
- Partials      101      103       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cli/network.go 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
cli/image_inspect.go 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pkg/kernel/kernel.go 72.72% <0%> (-10.61%) ⬇️
pkg/utils/utils.go 81.08% <0%> (-1.85%) ⬇️
cli/command.go 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
client/client.go 35.48% <0%> (+8.21%) ⬆️

@allencloud
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM

@pouchrobot pouchrobot added the LGTM one maintainer or community participant agrees to merge the pull reuqest. label Apr 4, 2018
@allencloud allencloud merged commit eb8484d into AliyunContainerService:master Apr 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
areas/cli areas/docs areas/network LGTM one maintainer or community participant agrees to merge the pull reuqest. size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants