Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update install step in INSTALLATION.md #2045

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2018

Conversation

xiechengsheng
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: xiechengsheng XIE1995@whut.edu.cn

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

Since the Makefile has been updated by previous PR, the install step in INSTALLATION.md should also be updated.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

None

Ⅲ. Describe how you did it

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

INSTALLATION.md Outdated
@@ -222,10 +222,10 @@ cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/alibaba/; git clone https://github.com/alibaba/pouch.g
cd pouch; git checkout master
```

Makefile target named `build` will compile the pouch and pouchd binaries in current work directory. Or you can just execute `make install` to build binaries and install them in destination directory (`/usr/local/bin` by default).
Makefile target named `build` will compile the pouch and pouchd binaries in current work directory. You can execute `make build && make install` to build binaries and install them in destination directory (`/usr/local/bin` by default).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

build into bin directory actually 😄

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, the make build would generate bin file into bin directory and make install would copy(or link?) this bin file to /usr/local/bin directory, is this pr anything wrong?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should update here the pouch and pouchd binaries in current work directory .

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, Got it. Thanks.

@allencloud
Copy link
Collaborator

This change is done by @fuweid
PTAL

Signed-off-by: xiechengsheng <XIE1995@whut.edu.cn>
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2045 into master will increase coverage by 12.54%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2045       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   51.18%   63.73%   +12.54%     
===========================================
  Files         200      201        +1     
  Lines       15531    15527        -4     
===========================================
+ Hits         7950     9896     +1946     
+ Misses       6513     4392     -2121     
- Partials     1068     1239      +171
Flag Coverage Δ
#criv1alpha1test 33.67% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#criv1alpha2test 34.15% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
#integrationtest 38.48% <ø> (?)
#unittest 22.2% <ø> (+0.2%) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cri/stream/httpstream/spdy/upgrade.go 54.28% <0%> (-5.72%) ⬇️
pkg/net/interface.go
pkg/netutils/listener.go 60.46% <0%> (ø)
pkg/netutils/interface.go 95.83% <0%> (ø)
daemon/logger/jsonfile/utils.go 71.54% <0%> (+0.81%) ⬆️
daemon/daemon.go 58.1% <0%> (+1.67%) ⬆️
daemon/mgr/spec_mount.go 77.55% <0%> (+2.04%) ⬆️
pkg/meta/boltdb.go 68.67% <0%> (+2.4%) ⬆️
apis/opts/mountpoint.go 90% <0%> (+2.85%) ⬆️
ctrd/watch.go 72.72% <0%> (+3.03%) ⬆️
... and 72 more

Copy link
Contributor

@fuweid fuweid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@fuweid fuweid merged commit 19c0c3a into AliyunContainerService:master Aug 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants