You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The google and numpy styles are available via the sphinx.ext.napoleon module.
Assuming that help is welcomed, then if a style is chosen I could help with setting up the documentation boilerplate, etc such that some documentation could be hosted on readthedocs for instance, or wherever you wish.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Help is most definitely welcomed, thank you being here and what you've done so far!
Let's do standard docstrings as I don't have either "domain-specific" or "legacy" reasons to use something different.
I'm optimistically assuming you'll agree with this, and closing it as "decision made." Feel free to reopen if we need to consider anything else before choosing to adopt it. Maybe a separate issue will be needed to ensure existing documentation if useful is converted over.
I would like to help in with the documentation of the code, and noticed different styles being used.
In some places it's the normal standard docstrings, as in:
while in other places it seems to be the NumPy style such as in:
More generally, as far as I know there are three possible approaches:
The google and numpy styles are available via the sphinx.ext.napoleon module.
Assuming that help is welcomed, then if a style is chosen I could help with setting up the documentation boilerplate, etc such that some documentation could be hosted on readthedocs for instance, or wherever you wish.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: