Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: start build() lazily #90

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

falconandy
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

build() body calls isBuilt.await() (somewhere in nested subcalls). The body was started immediately and can use uninitialized isBuilt. Now the 'build' body is started lazily just after isBuilt was initialized.

Checklist

  • Does your PR title have the correct title format?
  • Does your PR have a breaking change?: No

@falconandy
Copy link
Contributor Author

One test (session logic) is failing for some reason (not failed locally). Should be fixed in #89, I believe

Copy link
Contributor

@qingzhuozhen qingzhuozhen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change lg, maybe rebase after the other one merged and make sure the build pass.

@qingzhuozhen
Copy link
Contributor

Can you rebase the branch and resolve the conflict here?

@falconandy falconandy force-pushed the DXOC-282-NullPointerException branch from 4f1c527 to 211227a Compare October 28, 2022 04:57
@falconandy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@qingzhuozhen
Rebased.

@qingzhuozhen qingzhuozhen merged commit d829ba7 into main Oct 28, 2022
@qingzhuozhen qingzhuozhen deleted the DXOC-282-NullPointerException branch October 28, 2022 05:53
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2022
## [1.4.8](v1.4.7...v1.4.8) (2022-10-28)

### Bug Fixes

* start build() lazily ([#90](#90)) ([d829ba7](d829ba7))
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.4.8 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants