Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new unconfirmedServiceChoices who-Am-I (13), you-Are (14) #19

Open
duffy-ocraven opened this issue Sep 11, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

new unconfirmedServiceChoices who-Am-I (13), you-Are (14) #19

duffy-ocraven opened this issue Sep 11, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@duffy-ocraven
Copy link

BACnetUnconfirmedServiceChoice ::= ENUMERATED {
...
who-Am-I (13), 
you-Are (14)

The packet structures are:

Who-Am-I-Request ::= SEQUENCE {
 vendorID Unsigned, 
 modelName CharacterString, 
 serialNumber CharacterString
}

You-Are-Request ::= SEQUENCE {
 vendorID Unsigned, 
 modelName CharacterString, 
 serialNumber CharacterString
 deviceIdentifier BACnetObjectIdentifier  OPTIONAL,
 deviceMACAddress OctetString OPTIONAL 
}

These are so new, in PROTOCOL REVISION 22 (currently the latest) as Addendum 135-2016bz , approved by ASHRAE and by the American National Standards Institute on November 18, 2019 that there hasn't been time for the industry to decide whether to embrace or ignore these. In some niche scenarios, I expect adoption. And for completeness (because they cause the equivalent of a DHCP operation) they merit coverage.

@NothinRandom NothinRandom self-assigned this Sep 11, 2020
@NothinRandom NothinRandom added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants