Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retain schema order in projection #5053

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2023

Conversation

avantgardnerio
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #5052.

Rationale for this change

Described in issue.

What changes are included in this PR?

Removal of BTreeMap

Are these changes tested?

Yes, they were covered by a previous test.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Fields will be returned in a new order. This should be okay because no one is using update yet, and if they were they must have been tolerating random orders.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the sql SQL Planner label Jan 24, 2023
let assign_map = assignments
.iter()
.map(|assign| {
let col_name: &Ident = assign
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know this PR didn't add it, but the use of last seems somewhat wrong here -- maybe https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/cb05490df1ed27cd90d904296b7866187c6e737b/datafusion/sql/src/planner.rs#L333 or something would work 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is actually looking for the column name - we know the table name already. Is there an equivalent for columns?

Meta-question: is there a method for discoverability of these functions? I often assume there is a helper out there somewhere but struggle to find it...

@avantgardnerio avantgardnerio merged commit 43aca89 into apache:master Jan 24, 2023
@avantgardnerio avantgardnerio deleted the bg_schema_order branch January 24, 2023 22:45
@ursabot
Copy link

ursabot commented Jan 24, 2023

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = f627ed9 and contender = 43aca89. 43aca89 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on test-mac-arm] test-mac-arm
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ursa-i9-9960x] ursa-i9-9960x
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ursa-thinkcentre-m75q] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sql SQL Planner
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Retain the ordering of fields in the table schema when creating the projection for an update plan
3 participants