Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI integration test failing: Archery test With other arrows #6448

Closed
alamb opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #6449
Closed

CI integration test failing: Archery test With other arrows #6448

alamb opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #6449
Labels
arrow Changes to the arrow crate arrow-flight Changes to the arrow-flight crate bug next-major-release the PR has API changes and it waiting on the next major version parquet Changes to the parquet crate

Comments

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Sep 24, 2024

Describe the bug

The integration CI test began failing today on unrelated PRs

For example, #6441 does not change anything related to arrow at all and previously passed all CI tests, but then started failing on rerun

Example failure:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/actions/runs/11019977823/job/30603709550


Integration: Test: Result
  ################# FAILURES #################
  FAILED TEST: primitive Rust producing,  nanoarrow consuming
  <class 'subprocess.CalledProcessError'>: Command '/build/nanoarrow/nanoarrow_ipc_integration < /tmp/tmpliz4svj5/8df1b34a_generated_primitive.producer_file_as_stream' returned non-zero exit status 22.
  
  FAILED TEST: primitive_zerolength Rust producing,  nanoarrow consuming
  <class 'subprocess.CalledProcessError'>: Command '/build/nanoarrow/nanoarrow_ipc_integration < /tmp/tmpliz4svj5/e4bc7478_generated_primitive_zerolength.producer_file_as_stream' returned non-zero exit status 22.
  
  FAILED TEST: primitive_large_offsets Rust producing,  nanoarrow consuming
  <class 'RuntimeError'>: Command failed: /build/nanoarrow/nanoarrow_ipc_integration
  With output:
  --------------
  Validating that /tmp/tmpliz4svj5/44f1709c_generated_primitive_large_offsets.json_as_file reads identical to /tmp/arrow-integration-vmfk0_4_/generated_primitive_large_offsets.json
  Command VALIDATE failed (22=Invalid argument): Footer flatbuffer verification failed (16) vector header out of range or unaligned
...

To Reproduce
run CI job

Expected behavior
CI should pass

Additional context
It seems like this is perhaps related to unskipping NANOARROW in the integration tests here: apache/arrow#43715

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Sep 24, 2024

I plan to disable the nanoarrow integration on CI until the underlying issue #5052 is fixed

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Sep 24, 2024

Proposed fix for CI: #6449

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Oct 2, 2024

label_issue.py automatically added labels {'arrow'} from #6452

@alamb alamb added the parquet Changes to the parquet crate label Oct 2, 2024
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Oct 2, 2024

label_issue.py automatically added labels {'parquet'} from #6444

@alamb alamb added the arrow-flight Changes to the arrow-flight crate label Oct 2, 2024
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Oct 2, 2024

label_issue.py automatically added labels {'arrow-flight'} from #6444

@alamb alamb added the next-major-release the PR has API changes and it waiting on the next major version label Oct 2, 2024
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Oct 2, 2024

label_issue.py automatically added labels {'next-major-release'} from #6444

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arrow Changes to the arrow crate arrow-flight Changes to the arrow-flight crate bug next-major-release the PR has API changes and it waiting on the next major version parquet Changes to the parquet crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant