Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GitHub Workflow Replacements for Jenkins job_Python_ParDo_DataFlow and job_Python_ParDo_Flink #28894

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2023

Conversation

aleksandr-dudko
Copy link
Contributor

PR migrates Jenkins Jobs to Github Actions Workflow:
".github/workflows/beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Dataflow_Batch.yml"
".github/workflows/beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Dataflow_Streaming.yml"
".github/workflows/beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Flink_Batch.yml"
".github/workflows/beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Flink_Streaming.yml"

Jenkins Jobs:
https://ci-beam.apache.org/view/PerformanceTests/job/beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Dataflow_Batch/
https://ci-beam.apache.org/view/PerformanceTests/job/beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Dataflow_Streaming/
https://ci-beam.apache.org/view/PerformanceTests/job/beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Flink_Batch/
https://ci-beam.apache.org/view/PerformanceTests/job/beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Flink_Streaming/

The code has been tested on Self-hosted GKE runners ubuntu 20.04.

Example runs:
beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Dataflow_Batch https://github.com/aleksandr-dudko/beam/actions/runs/6447949303
image

beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Dataflow_Streaming https://github.com/aleksandr-dudko/beam/actions/runs/6447970021
image

beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Flink_Batch https://github.com/aleksandr-dudko/beam/actions/runs/6448187743
image

beam_LoadTests_Python_ParDo_Flink_Streaming
image

image


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the build label Oct 9, 2023
@magicgoody
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@andreydevyatkin andreydevyatkin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@aleksandr-dudko aleksandr-dudko marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2023 05:07
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @Abacn for label build.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

@Abacn Abacn merged commit 71b8e93 into apache:master Oct 13, 2023
3 checks passed
damondouglas pushed a commit to damondouglas/beam that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants