Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement](doris-future) Support "REGR_" aggregation functions (PART II) #38975

Open
2 of 3 tasks
zclllyybb opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #41240
Open
2 of 3 tasks

[Enhancement](doris-future) Support "REGR_" aggregation functions (PART II) #38975

zclllyybb opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #41240

Comments

@zclllyybb
Copy link
Contributor

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Description

We are going to support all regression functions in pg. You can see them in https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/functions-aggregate.html with regr_ prefix. And considring the difficulty of this task, it will be nice for community as "good first issue".

In this issue, you should implement function regr_intercept and regr_slope

If you'd like to work on it, please comment to let me know. I'll help you to achieve this.

Solution

you can found an example of implementation of a aggregate function here

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@ShivamChavan01
Copy link

Can I work On It @zclllyybb

@zclllyybb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can I work On It @zclllyybb

yes~ feel free to communicate when you meet problem.

@zclllyybb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ShivamChavan01 hello, any developments or problem recently?

@ShivamChavan01 ShivamChavan01 removed their assignment Sep 15, 2024
@Yoruet
Copy link

Yoruet commented Sep 16, 2024

I want to try it plz.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants