Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

branch-3.0: [fix](arrow-flight-sql) Fix Doris NULL column conversion to arrow batch #43929 #44231

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #43929

…ch (#43929)

### What problem does this PR solve?

Problem Summary:

The representation of NULL columns in Doris is special, which is
`DataTypeNull<DataTypeNumber::Uint8>`. `Uint8` uses
`arrow::BooleanBuilder` when serializing into arrow batch, which does
not match the expected `arrow::NullBuilder`.

Fix:

```
*** Query id: fd32741526804c1e-bc016473fd8f3aa3 ***
*** is nereids: 1 ***
*** tablet id: 0 ***
*** Aborted at 1731327262 (unix time) try "date -d @1731327262" if you are using GNU date ***
*** Current BE git commitID: 653e315 ***
*** SIGSEGV address not mapped to object (@0x100000024) received by PID 1442863 (TID 1443456 OR 0x7f8b8cdea700) from PID 36; stack trace: ***
 0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421
 1# PosixSignals::chained_handler(int, siginfo*, void*) [clone .part.0] in /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/jdk-17.0.2/lib/server/libjvm.so
 2# JVM_handle_linux_signal in /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/jdk-17.0.2/lib/server/libjvm.so
 3# 0x00007F8CA1F38B50 in /lib64/libc.so.6
 4# 0x000055FC45E5B2D3 in /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/output_run/be/lib/doris_be
 5# arrow::BooleanBuilder::AppendValues(unsigned char const*, long, unsigned char const*) in /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/output_run/be/lib/doris_be
 6# doris::vectorized::DataTypeNumberSerDe<unsigned char>::write_column_to_arrow(doris::vectorized::IColumn const&, doris::vectorized::PODArray<unsigned char, 4096ul, Allocator<false, false, false, DefaultMemoryAllocator>, 15ul, 16ul> const*, arrow::ArrayBuilder*, int, int, cctz::time_zone const&) const at /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/be/src/vec/data_types/serde/data_type_number_serde.cpp:86
 7# doris::FromBlockConverter::convert(std::shared_ptr<arrow::RecordBatch>*) at /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/be/src/util/arrow/block_convertor.cpp:390
 8# doris::convert_to_arrow_batch(doris::vectorized::Block const&, std::shared_ptr<arrow::Schema> const&, arrow::MemoryPool*, std::shared_ptr<arrow::RecordBatch>*, cctz::time_zone const&) in /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/output_run/be/lib/doris_be
 9# doris::vectorized::VArrowFlightResultWriter::write(doris::vectorized::Block&) at /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/be/src/vec/sink/varrow_flight_result_writer.cpp:76
10# doris::vectorized::VResultSink::send(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool) at /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/be/src/vec/sink/vresult_sink.cpp:149
11# doris::PlanFragmentExecutor::open_vectorized_internal() at /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/be/src/runtime/plan_fragment_executor.cpp:341
12# doris::PlanFragmentExecutor::open() at /mnt/disk2/liyifan/doris/doris_2.1/doris/be/src/runtime/plan_fragment_executor.cpp:273
```
@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Nov 19, 2024
@doris-robot
Copy link

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor Author

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@xinyiZzz xinyiZzz closed this Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants