Reverse Breaking Changes, Introduce beforeTemplate

[erikerikson]

As noted in the deprecated artillery-core repository (and antecedent of ~/core here), the change to the ordering of templating was breaking.

I recognize the importance of pre-templating customization/logic needs (it would have made artillery-core-uuid to produce variable values far easier to use and implement). However, it was a breaking change. Please reverse the breaking change.

To maintain support for the use cases you enabled with this change, I advise adding a beforeTemplate hook that appropriately names the timing and facilitates those use cases.

If you prefer not to retract the change, perhaps you can re-enable the ability to execute logic after templating but before request sending via a different hook.

[hassy]

Thanks @erikerikson! We will need to consider the options. Simply reversing the change runs the risk of breaking a lot of scripts out there that have come to rely on the current behavior of beforeRequest. Another hook is the best option in my opinion, but I'm not sure as to what the clearest / least ambiguous name might be - do you have any suggestions?

[erikerikson]

It's a tricky circumstance for sure with bad results regardless of choice. Those newer script creators may be more invested in updating them but aside from that I'd think that the size of the investment over time prior to this relatively recent change would outweigh the post-change investment. I don't have data to back that up on hand and it's clearly not my call to make. FWIW, given our prior investments, this occurrence calls to question the prudence of or stability of our investments.

I personally liked the semantics of the beforeRequest being just before the making of the request because the name and action were so tightly correlated. That was part of the reason I recommended beforeTemplate (although that's a code based name and may be a poor choice for communications to user as a result) given the subsequent use of the template method to render variables. Perhaps beforeVariableResolution would be more appropriate albeit a bit long. beforeResolution or beforeRender are shorter alternatives.

I suppose if you are asking for recommendations on the name for a re-introduction of the old semantics, something like beforeTransmission or beforeSend might suffice. While we will have to adopt the choice of the tool, I'd suggest that'd be the wrong direction to go.

[elgalu]

Thanks for reporting this.

Had to pin previous artillery:

  "dependencies": {
    "artillery": "1.6.0-26",
    "artillery-plugin-aws-sigv4": "0.0.3",
    "artillery-plugin-expect": "1.2.1"
  },

In order to solve this error:

The request signature we calculated does not match the signature you provided.

The Canonical String for this request should have been

'POST\n/endpoints/some-sm-endpoint/invocations\n\nhost:runtime.sagemaker.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com\nx-amz-date:20190331T055402Z\nx-amz-security-token:***==\n\nhost;x-amz-date;x-amz-security-token\n***'

The String-to-Sign should have been
'AWS4-HMAC-SHA256\n20190331T055402Z\n20190331/eu-central-1/sagemaker/aws4_request\n***'

[lukecleland-myfiziq]

This is still not working for me, can't add any variables to the request. Have tried @elgalu's comment above, also I've tried @galvinhsiu's fork. Nothing works. The beforeRequest is being run before the variables hence signature mismatch.

[Lillypot]

Hi - I'm having the same issue where I have installed the aws-sigv4 plugin and added the lines in my script. However, on executing using debug mode I get '"The request signature we calculated does not match the signature you provided. Check your AWS Secret Access Key and signing method. Consult the service documentation for details.\n\nThe Canonical String for this request should have been' Can anyone help me with this please? step by step instructions on how to resolve this issue as I have been struggling with this for several days. Thanks in advance

[erikerikson]

@Lillypot please go to the https://github.com/Nordstrom/artillery-plugin-aws-sigv4 repo. The instructions there should help but it not feel free to open an issue.

[Lillypot]

@Lillypot please go to the https://github.com/Nordstrom/artillery-plugin-aws-sigv4 repo. The instructions there should help but it not feel free to open an issue.

Hi @erikerikson -- yes I have used the instruction from these sites but the problem I have is that I connect via command line and assume my role and then when I run my script using debug mode I get mismatch of signatures. I have installed the plugin as per the instructions in the document link and add the plugin into the script.
I still get the '"The request signature we calculated does not match the signature you provided. Check your AWS Secret Access Key and signing method. Consult the service documentation for details.The Canonical String for this request should have been". Please advise ... Thanks again in advance
I notice that the beforerequest is not taking the body .. just an observation