Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Portamento up and down #2

Open
ngeiswei opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Portamento up and down #2

ngeiswei opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@ngeiswei
Copy link

ngeiswei commented Jan 17, 2024

Suggestion

Adding a portamento up/down control to mimic Protracker's 1xx/2xx effects.

Tentative Description (Subject to Change)

  • PUD (Portamento Up/Down) = 0. Default value, nothing is changed.
  • PUD = -x. Every 1/50 seconds, x cents of semitone is removed from the current pitch.
  • PUD = x. Every 1/50 seconds, x cents of semitone is added from the current pitch.

Motive

With such effect, one could potentially write a script to convert MOD to MIDI+Ami-Sampler.

EDIT: a better reason is to apply oldschool effects in newschool DAWs.

Placement

Where could such controller be placed on the GUI?

MIDI CC

Alternatively, since it is more a dynamic controller than a preset parameter, it could simply be a MIDI CC (or two, one for up, one for down).

Merely adding MIDI CC would have the advantage of not breaking backward compatibility.

Help

I'm happy to help implementing it. I just want your opinion before I start looking into it.

@ngeiswei
Copy link
Author

ngeiswei commented Jan 17, 2024

They are other Protracker effects such as

  • Arpeggio
  • Tremolo
  • Sample offset

Adding them to the GUI might start to be too much, but they could easily be mapped to MIDI CC as well.

@astriiddev
Copy link
Owner

That's definitely not a bad idea. I think the biggest challenge would be mapping all the MOD parameters to JUCE's AudioProcessorValueTreeState without having it even more cluttered (frankly it's already too cluttered for my liking 😅).

I did include note glide in monophonic mode which could be used to recreate portamento, but specifically a portamento control as well as tremolo and arpeggio would be cool to implement.

I've been considering adding an options menu that would show extended parameters in place of the waveform graphic and users could toggle between the menu and the waveform graphic (I'm thinking something similar to Plogue's Chipsynth SFC). Maybe the portamento, tremolo, and arpeggio controls can go in there?

I think mapping them to the AudioProcessorValueTreeState would be a better implementation than MIDI CC since that's what DAWs use for automation and then users can map their MIDI CC to the automation parameter; though this would require an extra settings menu in the standalone app to add CC mapping outside of the DAW.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants