-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Convolving new filters #47
Comments
@sagastar128 - sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Are you still having this issue? If so, could you give me the actual values you used for the filter? |
I think I found a rather crude workaround for my problem. I used the downloadable ASCII files of the late online fitting tool and sort of transplanted that data into the empty fits-file (I used the existing 2MASS filter/ascii file as reference for reordering). There was no issue for the three iphas filters. There I basically used the above mentioned webpage and took the txt-file of which I defined f.nu = first column, and f.response as the second column. Still not sure if that's ok. If added the Halpha filter as an example file: |
I have the same problem with Wise and Herschel filters. |
Hey,
I’m trying to convolve some more filters without much success at least in case of WISE/ALLWISE. For IPHAS data I just pulled the throughput of the filters from
http://catserver.ing.iac.es/filter/list.php?instrument=WFC&filtersystem=BroadAndNarrowBand&availability=Yes
This appeared to have worked fine, assuming the idea of using them was correct. For WISE I only found the relative spectral response according to section v. of:
http://wise2.ipac.caltech.edu/docs/release/prelim/expsup/sec4_3g.html
If I plug them into
f = Filter()
f.name = ...
f.central_wavelength = ...
f.nu = ...
f.response = ...
The result of the convolution is a fits containing 0’s. I don’t know how to fix that problem so I’d appreciate a little hint or help.
Thank you
Heim
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: