Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Essential building blocks for AsyncAPI, 20:00 UTC Tuesday March 12th 2024 #1084

Closed
asyncapi-bot opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
Labels

Comments

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented Mar 1, 2024

Meeting Info Details
Purpose Initial call with to create alignment about creating essential building blocks for AsyncAPI
Time 20:00 UTC | Translate to your time zone with the time zone converter.
Meeting Place Link
Zoom Join live.
YouTube Watch live and interact through live chat.
Twitch Watch live.
Twitter Watch live.
LinkedIn Watch live.
More Info Details
Meeting Recordings YouTube Playlist.
AsyncAPI Initiative Calendar Public URL.
iCal File Add to your calendar.
Newsletter Subscribe to get weekly updates on upcoming meetings.

Agenda

Don't wait for the meeting to discuss topics that already have issues. Feel free to comment on them earlier.

  1. Q&A
  2. Introduction
  3. Figure out our goal for the working group
  4. Figure out how we wanna structure the working group
  5. Place for your topic
  6. Q&A

Notes

Add notes here after the meeting.

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

Thanks for a great meeting @m-wild @lorenzsimon @VisualBean @Pakisan @Souvikns ✌️

The recording can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fic5PKFGG28

Recap from the meeting

Our understanding of what we are trying to do:

  • Solving it together
  • Similar tooling interface as when coming from OpenAPI
  • Similar tooling experience across languages

Our understanding of fundamental building blocks:

  • JSON Schema and validation is the same across languages
  • Libraries that act as base cornerstones of implementation for other languages
  • Editing and creating AsyncAPI documents, especially through Visual editors
  • Enabling the same functionality for references across languages and generally working with references
  • Serialization and deserialization of documents in languages
  • Integration into frameworks
  • Same quality for bindings

Things to consider going forward:

  • Reaching out to consumers of building blocks such as for example backstage to get perspective and depth of problems currently being phased.

Questions to think about:

  • How would it look like if we had no existing tooling what would the best developer experience look like? Which tooling would be available and where?

Agreements we had in the meeting:

  • Using GitHub projects as our main tool for coordinating
  • @jonaslagoni will act as chairman at least in the beginning
  • Suggesting to move the meeting to 7 pm GMT+1 (or 6 pm)

Actionable items

  • Using GitHub projects as our main tool for coordinating
  • Suggesting to move the meeting a bit to 7 pm GMT+1 every week (at least here in the beginning).
  • @jonaslagoni will act as chairman at least in the beginning
  • @jonaslagoni is gonna create the initial official working group proposal
  • @jonaslagoni is gonna set up the next meeting once we agree on a time and date as above.

Did I miss anything 🤔?

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

jonaslagoni commented Mar 13, 2024

Suggesting to move the meeting a bit to 7 pm GMT+1 every week (at least here in the beginning).

@m-wild @lorenzsimon @VisualBean @Pakisan @Souvikns please have a look at the suggested meeting change and whether it fits everyone ✌️ I will create the next meeting as soon as we are aligned there.

As well as all the other actionable items to make sure you still agree with them 🤙

Regarding the next meeting, I would suggest that we discuss the following:

  • Come up with a plan going forward for what specific problems we want to focus on first and have in mind for later.
  • How do we figure out if what we do matters and improve things? Can we measure it somehow?

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

Created the initial working group suggestion #1098 please have a look when you get a spare minute.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants