We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IPSet([IP('0.0.0.0/1'), IP('128.0.0.0/1')]) results in IPSet([IP('0.0.0.0/0')])
0.0.0.0/0 is meant to be a negative test case here and hence becomes a mismatch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a consequence, or is it another bug?
[ 5s] ====================================================================== [ 5s] FAIL: testRandomContains (__main__.TestIPSet) [ 5s] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ 5s] Traceback (most recent call last): [ 5s] File "test/test_fuzz.py", line 88, in testRandomContains [ 5s] "%s in %s != %s (made from %s)" % (question, ipset, answer, prefixes)) [ 5s] AssertionError: True != False : 0.0.0.0/0 in IPSet([IP('0.0.0.0/0')]) != False (made from [IP('96.0.0.0/4'), IP('209.0.0.0/8'), IP('137.17.244.240/29'), IP('231.32.0.0/13'), IP('37.240.0.0/13'), IP('83.180.0.0/15'), IP('132.64.0.0/13'), IP('126.31.9.0/24'), IP('141.137.182.96/29'), IP('112.24.170.0/24'), IP('116.34.64.0/20'), IP('36.17.30.0/25'), IP('25.201.182.128/26'), IP('251.73.68.0/22'), IP('184.0.0.0/7'), IP('201.152.186.128/26'), IP('24.48.0.0/12'), IP('205.66.128.0/24'), IP('0.0.0.0/1'), IP('239.87.111.0/25'), IP('46.0.0.0/9'), IP('164.103.0.0/18'), IP('54.18.233.0/26'), IP('128.0.0.0/1'), IP('68.140.172.0/30'), IP('30.248.250.208/28')]) [ 5s] [ 5s] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ 5s] Ran 3000 tests in 1.489s
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
IPSet([IP('0.0.0.0/1'), IP('128.0.0.0/1')]) results in IPSet([IP('0.0.0.0/0')])
0.0.0.0/0 is meant to be a negative test case here and hence becomes a mismatch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: