Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AWS::ApiGateway::GatewayResponse.ResponseType typo #1126

Conversation

jlongtine
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes:

AWS::ApiGateway::GatewayResponse.ResponeType -> AWS::ApiGateway::GatewayResponse.ResponseType`

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@kddejong
Copy link
Contributor

kddejong commented Sep 4, 2019

Good catch.

@kddejong
Copy link
Contributor

kddejong commented Sep 4, 2019

Looks like we sucked down 6.0.0 of the CloudFormation spec too. Fun day of releases continues.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1126 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1126   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.77%   87.77%           
=======================================
  Files         135      135           
  Lines        7990     7990           
  Branches     1963     1963           
=======================================
  Hits         7013     7013           
+ Misses        580      579    -1     
- Partials      397      398    +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/cfnlint/rules/__init__.py 88.44% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bf18663...eec02a1. Read the comment docs.

@chuckmeyer chuckmeyer merged commit d4eb29e into aws-cloudformation:master Sep 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants