AppConfig L2 Construct

[yamatatsu]

Description

I would like to implement AppConfig L2 Construct. It has already got enough votes (see, aws/aws-cdk#6831). Also, I believe that CDK, which is more application-oriented than CFn, will be able to manage AppConfig well, which will create a variety of value.

Roles

Role	User
Proposed by	@yamatatsu
Author(s)	@alias, @alias, @alias
API Bar Raiser	@alias
Stakeholders	@alias, @alias, @alias

See RFC Process for details

Workflow

• Tracking issue created (label: status/proposed)
• API bar raiser assigned (ping us at #aws-cdk-rfcs if needed)
• Kick off meeting
• RFC pull request submitted (label: status/review)
• Community reach out (via Slack and/or Twitter)
• API signed-off (label api-approved applied to pull request)
• Final comments period (label: status/final-comments-period)
• Approved and merged (label: status/approved)
• Execution plan submitted (label: status/planning)
• Plan approved and merged (label: status/implementing)
• Implementation complete (label: status/done)

---

Author is responsible to progress the RFC according to this checklist, and
apply the relevant labels to this issue so that the RFC table in README gets
updated.

[neo01124]

Is this L2 construct already merged? Wondering since this issue is completed but the feature request is open aws/aws-cdk#6831

[evgenyka]

No, it was not implemented, the RFC was abandoned.